Construction Contract Clarity: Conceptual Process Flow Modeling

Article Preview

Abstract:

Construction contracts can be a complex subject if issues corresponding to their interpretation and administration are not handled properly. The need for clarity of construction contracts is eminent especially in the context of the construction industry. The paper holds that a better interpretation and understanding of construction contracts could offer a proactive approach to avoid the inevitability of conflicts occurring in a project. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to develop a conceptual process flow model on how to clarify contract provisions in a contract. It is a subsequent development from the survey and case study that carried out for Malaysian Public Works Department (PWD) -203A (Rev. 10/83) Contract Form. The model is based on the results on the survey and case study, but it designed to render a generic approach of clarifying process for other contracts. Data Flow Diagram (DFD) method was selected to illuminate the process flow as the method focuses on object perspective and appropriate for this development. Certain limitations and recommendations of the model were highlighted. Ultimately, the model renders a useful guideline for future contract drafting and an important insight on clarity approach in contract administration for dispute avoidance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

344-348

Citation:

Online since:

December 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] E. Martin: Prof. Issues in Eng. Edu. and Prac. Vol 119 (1993), p.147.

Google Scholar

[2] J.C. Broome and R. W. Hayes: Int. J. of Pro. Manage. Vol 15 (1997), p.255.

Google Scholar

[3] R. Rameezdeen and C. Rajapakse: Constr. Manage. & Eco. Vol 25 (2007), p.729.

Google Scholar

[4] R. Shumway, A. Richard and J. Ritti: Lead. & Manage. in Eng. Vol 4 (2004), p.93.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Cutts: Oxford Guide to Plain English (Oxford University Press, New York 2004).

Google Scholar

[6] J.M. Feinman: 1001 Legal Words You Need to Know (Oxford University Press, New York 2003).

Google Scholar

[7] H. Henkin: Drafting Engineering Contracts (Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Ltd., New York 1998).

Google Scholar

[8] C.A. Hill: Why Contracts are Written in Legalese, (Kent College of Law, Chicago 2001).

Google Scholar

[9] M.I. Mohamad and M. Zulkifli: Understanding Contract Documentation, Proceedings of the 6th Asia-Pacific Structural Engineering and Construction Conference, (2006) Sept. 5-6; UTM, Malaysia.

Google Scholar

[10] C.F. Lim: The Malaysian PWD Form of Construction Contract (Sweet & Maxwell Asia, Selangor 2004).

Google Scholar

[11] H.R. Thomas, G.R. Smith and R.E. Mellott: J. of Constr. Eng. & Manage. Vol 120 (1994), p.321.

Google Scholar

[12] S. Styllis: Constructing Construction Contract: the Need for Clarity (Reed Business Information, Sutton 2005).

Google Scholar

[13] H.Y. Chong and M.Z. Rosli: Int. J. Pro. Manage. Vol 28 (2010), p.601.

Google Scholar

[14] C.N. Candlin, V.K. Bhatia and C.H. Jensen: J. of Eng. for Spec. Purp. Vol 21 (2002), p.299.

Google Scholar

[15] C.Y.L. Melissa: New Engineering Contract (NEC) 1993 as Radical Changes to the Malaysian Standard Forms of Contract (Master Thesis. University of Technology Malaysia, Malaysia 2006).

Google Scholar

[16] W.H. Luo and Y.A. Tung: J. of Ind. Manage. & Data Syst. Vol 99 (1999), p.312.

Google Scholar

[17] A.S.M. Tam, L.K. Chu and D. Sculli: J. of Ind. Manage. & Data Syst. Vol 101 (2001), p.144.

Google Scholar