An Integrated Approach for Optimization of Honeycomb Sandwich Structure under Impact Load

Abstract:

In this paper weight optimization of sandwich structure consisting of a honeycomb core sandwiched between two layers is presented through the use of Sequential Quadratic Programming & Genetic Algorithm by constraining of certain parameters such as buckling stress, cost and geometry. The variables to be optimized are core height, face sheet thickness and cell thickness for an effective design and better performance of the entire structural system. Sequential Quadratic Programming in Matlaband Genetic Algorithm technique with high robustness is performed and comparison between the two results is made for early convergence of the variables to be optimized. In this way, the structure could easily be monitored for any volatility, and avoid probable failure by employing proper remedial action.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 152-154)
• Pages: 1717-1722
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.152-154.1717
• Online since: January 2012
• Authors: Hamdan Ajmal Khan, Faizan Habib Vance, Asif Israr, Tanzeel Ur Rehman
• Keywords: Core, Face Sheet, Genetic Algorithm (GA), Impact, Optimization, Sandwich Structure

References

[1] Y Chi, G.S. Langdon, G.N. Nurick. (2010). The influence of core height and face plate thickness on the response. Materials Design, Vol. 31(4), pp.1887-1899.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.058

[2] M. Corvino, L. Iuspa ,A. Riccio,F. Scaramuzzino. (2009). Weight and cost oriented multi-objective optimization of impact damage resistant stiffened composite panels. Computer & Structures, Vol. 87(15-16), pp.1033-1042.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.04.020

[3] W. Miller, C.W. Smith, K.E. Evans. (2011). Honeycomb cores with enhanced buckling strength. Composite Structure, Vol. 93(3), pp.1072-1077.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.09.021

[4] Marco Gigliotti, AnielloRiccio, Luigi Iuspa, Francesco Scaramuzzino, Luigi Mormile. (2009). Weight optimization of damage resistant composite panels with a posteriori cost evaluation. Composite Structures, Vol. 88(2), pp.312-322.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.04.012

[5] M. Kaufmann, D. Zenkert, M. Åkermo. (2010). Cost/weight optimization of composite prepreg structures for best draping strategy. Composites, Vol. 41(4), pp.464-472.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.012

[6] PizhongQiao, Wei Fan, Julio F. Davalos, GuipingZou. (2008). Optimization of transverse shear moduli for composite honeycomb cores. Composites Structures, Vol. 85(3), pp.265-274.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.04.011

[7] Guangyong Sun, Guangyao Li, Michael Stone, Qing Li. (2010). A two-stage multi-fidelity optimization procedure for honeycomb-type cellular materials. Computational Materials Science, Vol. 49(3), pp.500-511.

DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.041

[8] Wang, Dongmei. (2009). Impact behavior and energy absorption of paper honeycomb sandwich panels. International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 36(1), pp.110-114.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.03.002

[9] Bartulucci, Stefano. (2004). Commercial application of aluminum honeycomb and foam in load bearing of tubular structure. MSc Thesis, MIT, USA.