Dynamic Modeling for a Non-Linear System Based on the MOESP Algorithm

Abstract:

In order to measure accurately air fuel ratio in the engine exhaust gas, the Hammerstein model of the exhaust gas oxygen (EGO) sensor was identified using the multivariable output error state space (MOESP) algorithm. Firstly, a static model of the EGO sensor was identified based on engine experiment data as a static nonlinear part of the Hammerstein model. Then, the MOESP algorithm was used to build a state space model (SSM) of dynamic linear part of the Hammerstein model. To estimate model order, the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Minimum Description Length (MDL) criterion were computed, and validity of structure identification was verified by residual analysis. Then, the auto-regressive model with exogenous input (ARX) was compared with a subspace model. The result shows that a two-order SSM using MOESP algorithm is suitable to dynamic part of the Hammerstein model for EGO sensors.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 164)
• Pages: 467-472
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.164.467
• Online since: April 2012
• Authors: Qin Teng, Jian Bo Zhang, Peng An
• Keywords: AIC Criterion, Dynamic Modelling, Exhaust Gas Oxygen Sensor, Hammerstein Model, MDL Criterion, MOESP Model

References

[1] M. Verhaegen and D. Westwick: Identifying MIMO Hammerstein systems in the context of subspace model identification methods, Internal. J. Control, Vol. 63(1996), pp.331-349.

DOI: 10.1080/00207179608921846

[2] D. Westwick and M. Verhaegen: Identification MIMO Wiener systems using subspace model identification methods, Signal Processing, Vol. 52(1996), p.235–258.

DOI: 10.1016/0165-1684(96)00056-4

[3] M. Verhaegen and P. Dewilde: Subspace model Identification, Part 1: The output-error state-space model identification class of algorithms, Internal. J. Control, Vol. 56(1992), pp.1187-1210.

DOI: 10.1080/00207179208934363

[4] M. Verhaegen and P. Dewilde, Subspace model Identification, Part 2, J. Control, Vol. 56(1992), pp.1211-1241.

[5] M. Verhaegen: Identification of the deterministic part of MIMO state space models given in innovation form from input-output data, Automatica, Vol. 30(1994), pp.61-74.

DOI: 10.1016/0005-1098(94)90229-1

[6] Tohru Katayama, Giorgio Picci: Realization of stochastic systems with exogenous inputs and subspace identification methods, Automatica, Vol. 35(1999), pp.1635-1652.

DOI: 10.1016/s0005-1098(99)00072-2

[7] P. Van Overschee, B. De Moor: Subspace algorithms for the stochastic identification problem, Automatica, Vol. 29(1993), pp.649-660.

DOI: 10.1016/0005-1098(93)90061-w

[8] P. Van Overschee, B. De Moor: N4SID: Subspace algorithms for the identification of combined deterministic stochastic systems, Automatica, Vol. 30(1994), pp.75-93.

DOI: 10.1016/0005-1098(94)90230-5

[9] T. Bastogne, H. Noura, P. Sibille, A. Pichard: Multivariable identification of a winding process by subspace methods of tension control, Control Engineering Practice, Vol. 6(1998), pp.1077-1088.

DOI: 10.1016/s0967-0661(98)00069-0

[10] Hirotugu Akaike: A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, Vol. 19(1974), pp.716-723.

DOI: 10.1109/tac.1974.1100705

[11] A. Barron, J. Rissanen, Bin Yu: The minimum description length principle in coding and modeling, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. 44(1998), pp.2743-2746.

DOI: 10.1109/18.720554