Quantification of Field of View and Blind Zone Reduction for Safe Driving

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents the quantification of Field of View of external Rear View Mirror in automobiles. The decision based on available Field of View and the blind zone for lane changing is one of the major factors in road accident. This study presents a preliminary study of quantifying field of view of rear view mirror in automotive vehicles. A simple method of estimating the Field of View is shown and also a passive method of increasing the Field of View is discussed. The proposed method helps the designers and road users to choose the mirror of right size to provide extra field of view beyond the regulatory requirements.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

330-333

Citation:

Online since:

April 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Sarani, A. Roslan, and N. Saniran, ADSA fact sheet vol. 1, Malysian Institute of Road Safety Research (MIROS), May (2011).

Google Scholar

[2] M.J. Flannagan, M. Sivak, and E.C. Traube, Quantifying the direct field of view when driver-side rearview mirrors, SAE 1999-01-0656.

DOI: 10.4271/1999-01-0656

Google Scholar

[3] G. Platzer, An FMVSS 111 compliant driver's side mirror incorporating a blind zone viewing section, SAE 2006 – 01 – 1291.

DOI: 10.4271/2006-01-1291

Google Scholar

[4] EEC directive 71/ 127/ EEC (directive on the approximation of the laws of member states relating to the rear-view mirrors of motor vehicles) as amended by directive 79/795/EEC, 85/205/EEC, 86/562/EEC, 87/354/EEC, and 88/321/EEC.

DOI: 10.54648/ijcl1992038

Google Scholar

[5] J.A. Fisher, and I.A.R. Galer, The effects of decreasing the radius of curvature of convex external rear view mirrors upon drivers' judgments of vehicles approaching in the rearward visual field, Ergonomics, 27 (12), (1984), 1209-1224.

DOI: 10.1080/00140138408963603

Google Scholar

[6] H. Hecht, and J. Brauer, Convex rear view mirrors compromise distance and time-to-contact judgements, Ergonomics, 50, 4 (2007), 601-614.

DOI: 10.1080/00140130601154954

Google Scholar

[7] J. Luoma, M. Sivak, and M.J. Flannagan, Effects of nonplanar driver-side mirrors on lane-change crashes, Transportation Human Factors, 2, (2000), 279-289.

DOI: 10.1207/sthf0203_7

Google Scholar

[8] T. Ayres, L. Li, D. Trachtman, and D. Young, Passenger-side rear-view mirrors: driver behavior and safety, Intl. J. Industrial Ergonomics, 35, (2005), 157-162.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2004.05.009

Google Scholar

[9] A. Higashiyama, Y. Yokoyama, and K. Shimono, Perceived distance of targets in convex mirrors, Japanese Psychological Research, 43, (2001), 13-24.

DOI: 10.1111/1468-5884.00155

Google Scholar

[10] A. Higashiyama, and K. Shimono, Mirror vision: Perceived size and perceived distances of virtual images, Perception & Psychophysics, 66, (2004), 679-691.

DOI: 10.3758/bf03194911

Google Scholar