Experimental Study on Confinement Effectiveness of Different CFRP Hybridized Methods in Retrofitting Shear Deficient HSC Columns

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effectiveness of four different carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) hybridized methods to retrofit the high strength concrete columns with shear capacity deficiency for improving the shear behavior is described in this paper. These retrofitting methods include the wrapped jacketing, the L-shaped jacketing combined with wrapped jacketing, the clamp plates plus wrapped jacketing and the L-shaped jacketing, clamp plates and wrapped jacketing. Five specimens were tested under low reversed cyclic loading. The influence of retrofitting on the failure mode, ductility, strength, stiffness degradation, and distribution of CFRP strain is analyzed. The results indicate that the retrofitted specimens exhibit high levels of ductility superior to the reference specimen. Among the four retrofitting methods, the effectiveness of method of only the wrapped jacketing is the worst, the method of the clamp plates plus wrapped jacketing has better performance compared to the method of the L-shaped jacketing combined with wrapped jacketing, and the method of the L-shaped jacketing, clamp plates and wrapped jacketing performs best.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1565-1573

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Y. Xiao, H. Wu, and G.R. Martin: Journal of Structural Engineering. Vol. 125 (1999), p.255

Google Scholar

[2] J.G. Teng, J.F. Chen, S.T. Smith and L. Lam, in: FRP Strengthened RC Structures, edited by Wiley, Chichester (2002), in press

Google Scholar

[3] A.K.H. Kwan and J.C.M. Ho: Advances in Structural Engineering. Vol. 13 (2010), p.651

Google Scholar

[4] Y.F. Wu, T. Liu and D.J. Oehlers: Advances in Structural Engineering. Vol. 9 (2006), p.507

Google Scholar

[5] A. Nanni and M.S. Norris: Construction and Building Materials. Vol. 9 (1995), p.273

Google Scholar

[6] Z.X. Li, C.X. Xu, M. Jing, W.D. Cai and Y.C. Hao: Journal of Building Structures. Vol. 23 (2002), p.41 (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[7] D. Anggawidjaja, T. Ueda, J. Dai and H. Nakai: Cement and Concrete Composites. Vol. 28 (2006), p.914

Google Scholar

[8] A. Mirmiran, M. Shahawy, M. Samaan, H. El Echary, J.C. Mastrapa and O. Pico: Journal of Composites for Construction. Vol. 2 (1998), p.175

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(1998)2:4(175)

Google Scholar

[9] Y.F. Wu, T. Liu, and Wang L: Journal of Composites for Construction. Vol. 12 (2008), p.53

Google Scholar

[10] Z.M. Zhang, T. Liu, Y. Gui and W. Feng: China Civil Engineering Journal. Vol. 41 (2008), p.15 (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[11] S.Y. Wang and W.H. Yu: China Civil Engineering Journal. Vol. 43 (2010), p.429 (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[12] L.P. Ye, K. Zhang, S.H. Zhao and P. Feng: Construction and Building Materials. Vol. 17 (2003), p.499

Google Scholar

[13] L. De Lorenzis and R. Tepfers: Journal of Composites for Construction. Vol. 7 (2003), p.219

Google Scholar