Large Eddy Simulation of the Gas–Liquid Flow in a Cylindrical Cross-Sectioned Bubble Column

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper is concerned with the numerical study of gas–liquid flow in bubble columns by large eddy simulations (LES). The Euler–Euler approach is used to describe the equations of motion of the two-phase flow. The mean velocities and the fluctuating velocities are obtained. It is found that, when the drag, lift and virtual mass forces are used, the computed results in agreement with experimental transient behavior can be captured.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2703-2707

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Sokolichin, A., Eigenberger, G., Lapin, A., & A.. Dynamic numerical simulations of gas–liquid two-phase flows, Euler/Euler versus Euler/Lagrange. Chemical Engineering Science, 52, 611–626,(1997).

DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2509(96)00425-3

Google Scholar

[2] Kuipers, J. A. M., & van Swaaij, W. P. M.. Computational fluid dynamics applied to chemical reaction engineering. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 13, 3. (1997).

DOI: 10.1515/revce.1997.13.3.1

Google Scholar

[3] Jacobsen, C. B.. Large eddy simulation of con>ned swirling flow. Ph.D. Thesis, Aalborg University. (1997)

Google Scholar

[4] Jakobsen, H. A., Sannaes, B. H., Grevskott, S., & Svendsen, H. F.. Modeling of vertical bubble-driven flows. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 36, 4052–4074. (1997).

DOI: 10.1021/ie970276o

Google Scholar

[5] Hjertager, B. H.. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of multiphase chemical reactors. Trends in Chemical Engineering, 4, 45–92. (1998)

Google Scholar

[6] Zha, J. R. and J. Y. Chen, Theory and Application of Transfer Processes,Metallurgy Industry Press, Beijing (1997) (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] Sato, Y., & Sekoguchi, K.. Liquid velocity distribution in two-phase bubble 'ow. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2, 79. (1975)

DOI: 10.1016/0301-9322(75)90030-0

Google Scholar

[8] Smagorinsky, J.. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Monthly Weather Review, 91, 99–165. (1963)

DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:gcewtp>2.3.co;2

Google Scholar

[9] Delnoij, E., Lammers, F. A., Kuipers, J. A. M., & van Swaaij, W. P. M.. Dynamic simulation of dispersed gas–liquid two-phase flow using a discrete bubble model. Chemical Engineering Science, 52, 1429–1458. (1997)

DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2509(96)00515-5

Google Scholar

[10] Clift, R., J. R. Grace, and M. E. Weber, Bubbles, Drops, and Particles,Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, London (1978).

Google Scholar

[11] Ishii, M., & Zuber, N.. Drag coeLcient and relative velocity in bubbly, droplet or particulate flows. AIChE Journal, 25(5), 843–855. (1979)

DOI: 10.1002/aic.690250513

Google Scholar

[12] Deen, N. G., Hjertager, B. H., & Solberg, T.. Comparison of PIV and LDA measurement methods applied to the gas–liquid flow in a bubble column. Presented at the 10th international symposium on applications of laser techniques to fluid mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal. (2000a)

Google Scholar