The approach route for formulating overall planning could be analyzed by means of the theory of “Figure-Ground Relation” belonging to iconology. From old Measures to new Measures, the approach routes have been changed to “ground-figure” from “figure-ground”, namely, former “construction” first and “protection” secondary is changed to “protection” first and “construction” secondary, and the planning of “city” primary and “countryside” secondary is changed to overall planning for “city” and “countryside”. Attaching importance to the approach routes for formulating overall planning of “Figure-Ground Relation” makes up the controlled thinking tradition, which is one of two great thinking traditions for city planning, as well as a deficiency of overall planning formulation all the time in our country, so as to promote self-examination on overall planning based on garden city theory standing for modern city planning, accordingly make the measures for formulating overall planning regressed to value harmonious relationship of city and countryside.
You might also be interested in these eBooks
Info:
© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved
[1]
Zhangmin. City Planning Methods Study[D].Doctorate paper of Nanjing University，2002.
Google Scholar
[2]
Visual Thinking[M] compiled by Rudolf Arnheim and translated by Teng Shouyao. Beijing：Guangming Daily Press，1986.
Google Scholar
[3]
Yang Baojun etc. Overall Planning Amendments and Recent Construction Planning (Forum)[J]. City Planning，2005（11）.
Google Scholar
[4]
Luo Zhendong，Zhang Jingxiang. Study progress and thought on non-urban construction land planning currently in China[J]. Urban Planning Forum，2007（1）.
Google Scholar
[5]
Zhang Guoqing. Public Policy Analysis[M].Shanghai: Fudan University Press，2004.
Google Scholar
[6]
Long Haibo. Discussion on Value orientation of Public Policy Analysis [J]. Academic Journal of Guizhou Industrial University，2004（8）
Google Scholar
[7]
Sun Shiwen. Urban Planning Philosophy [M]. Beijing：China Architecture & Building Press，1998.
Google Scholar
[8]
Li Dongquan，Zhou Yixing. Discussion on historical basis of modern city planning thought formation in China from the view of Qingdao planning development in modern times [J]. Academic Journal of City Planning，2005（4）.
Google Scholar
[9]
Wu Zhiqiang. Discussion on China urban planning system jointing with the world [J]. Academic Journal of City Planning，2001（1）.
Google Scholar
[10]
Sun Shiwen. Dilemma of rational thinking on China urban planning[J]. Academic Journal of City Planning，2007（2）.
Google Scholar
[11]
Wei Yaping，Zhao Min.Idealism and rationalism concepts on city planning[J]. City Planning，2003（8）.
Google Scholar
[12]
Tomorrow's Garden City [M] wrote by Ebenezer Howard and translated by Jin Jingyuan. Background：Commercial Press，2002.
Google Scholar
[13]
Jin Jingyuan. Re-discussion on Howard's Tomorrow's Garden City [J]. Foreign city planning，1996（4）.
Google Scholar
[14]
Jin Jingyuan. National character in Tomorrow's Garden City stands for new era of city planning[J] Academic Journal of City Planning，1998（6）.
Google Scholar
[15]
Jiang Yong. Thoughts on Implementation of Urban and Rural Planning Law[J]. City Planning，2008（1）.
Google Scholar
[16]
Yebing，Liping. Exact understanding ideological connotation of Tomorrow's Garden City [J]. Regional research and development，2008（2）.
Google Scholar
[17]
Yang Baojun，Min Xiying. Analysis on Measures for formulating city planning of new edition [J]. Academic Journal of City Planning，2006（4）
Google Scholar
