Isolation and Characterization of Denitrifying Bacterium Pseudomonas mendocina aHD7 with Anaerobic Ammonium Oxidization

Article Preview

Abstract:

A denitrifying bacterium aHD7 with nitrate removal efficiency of 91.67% (w/w) in 3 days cultured at 30 °C under stationary conditions was isolated from the activated sludge. The strain was characterized by biochemical tests and 16S rDNA sequence analysis, to be belonging to Pseudomonas. Factors on denitrification ability of aHD7, i.e., pH value, carbon source, C/N ratio, nitrogen source and initial nitrate concentration were investigated. Results showed that this strain could either use nitrate or nitrite as the electron acceptor, and the total inorganic nitrogen removal efficiency for sodium nitrite and potassium nitrate were up to 96.70% (w/w) and 95.93% (w/w) respectively. Denitrification was favored when the pH value was 6-9 and C/N ratio varied from 6 to 8, in which the optimal carbon source was ethanol. The strain had anammox activity, of which the average ammonium utilization rate reached up to 4.56 mg/l/d.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

699-703

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A.A. Van de Graaf, P. de Bruijn, L.A. Robertson, M.S.M. Jetten and J.G. Kuenen: Water Res. Vol. 41 (1996), pp.1623-1634

Google Scholar

[2] U. Van Dongen, S.M.S. Jetten and M.C.M. van Loosdrecht: Water Sci. Technol. Vol. 44 (2001), pp.153-160

Google Scholar

[3] W.R.L. Van der Star, W.R. Abma, D. Blommers, J.W. Mulder, T. Tokutomi, M. Strous, C. Picioreanu and M.C.M. Van Loosdrecht: Water Res. Vol. 41 (2007), pp.4149-4163

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.03.044

Google Scholar

[4] B. Kartal, J.G. Kuenen and M.C.M. van Loosdrecht: Science 328 (2010), pp.702-703 .

Google Scholar

[5] S. Philips, H.J. Laanbroek and W. Verstraete: Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. Vol. 1 (2002), pp.115-141

Google Scholar

[6] G. Ruiz, D. Jeison and R. Chamy : Water Res. Vol. 37 (2003), pp.1371-1377

Google Scholar

[7] T. Khin and A.P. Annachhatre: Biotehnol. Adv. Vol. 22 (2004), pp.519-532

Google Scholar

[8] H.W. Sun, Q. Yang, Y.Z. Peng, X.N. Shi, S.Y. WANG and S.J. Zhang : Chin. J. Chem. Eng. Vol. 17 (2009), pp.1027-1031

Google Scholar

[9] P. Zheng, F.M. Lin, B.L. Hu and J.S. Chen: J. Environ. Sci. Vol. 16 (2004), pp.13-16

Google Scholar

[10] N. Takaya, M.A.B. Catalan-Sakairi, Y. Sakaguchi, I. Kato, Z. Zhou and H. Shoun: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Vol. 69 (2003), pp.3152-3157

DOI: 10.1128/aem.69.6.3152-3157.2003

Google Scholar

[11] J.G. Holt, N.R. Kreig, P.H. Sneath, J.T. Staley and S.T. Williams, Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology (Williams and Wilkins Publishers, Baltimore 1994).

Google Scholar

[12] APHA, AWWA, WEF, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (American Public Health Association, Washington 1998).

Google Scholar

[13] O. Modin, K. Fukushi and K. Yamamoto: Water Res. Vol. 41 (2007), pp.2726-2738

Google Scholar

[14] J.J. Her and J.S. Huang: Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 54(1995), pp.45-51

Google Scholar

[15] B.L. Hu, P. Zheng, J.Y. Li, X.Y. Xu and R.C. Jin: Sci. China Ser. C. Vol. 49 (2006), pp.460-466

Google Scholar

[16] E. Broda: Z. Allg. Mikrobiol. Vol. 17(1977), pp.491-493

Google Scholar