Flow Field Analysis and Numerical Simulation for Dynamic Filtration with Rotating Disks

Article Preview

Abstract:

Dynamic filtration with rotating disks is modeled by three-dimensional graphics software and its flow field is analyzed and numerical simulated by CFD software. The mechanical stability of dynamic filtration with rotating disks in the work process is analyzed by the model of rotating flow. The results show that the farthest end of rotating disks exit the largest flow velocity. There are two circular flows, which can remove the pollutants of rotating disks. The pressure of water is gradually increased as the main flow is near cylinder of the filtration. Simulation results are consistent to the practice, which provides important theoretical basis for improving and optimization of dynamic filtration with rotating disks.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

244-247

Citation:

Online since:

June 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Yang Liu, Chen Wen-mei, Dai Guang-qing, Shu Chao-hui, research and application progress of Rotating dynamic membrane separation technology, Fluid machinery, 2001, 27(9).

Google Scholar

[2] Xu Zhou, He Gao-hong, Luhui Ding, CFD Simulation of Dynamic Filtration System with Rotating Disk, Dalian university of technology,Master thesis,(2009).

Google Scholar

[3] Shen Liang, Chen Wen-mei, Huang Wei-ju, Li Jian-ming, Review on membrane separators using rotation to enhance filtration performance, chemical equipment technology, 2002, 23(1).

Google Scholar

[4] Serra C A, Wiesner M R.A comparison of rotating and stationary membrane disk filters using computational fluid dynamics. J of Mem Sci, 2000, 165: 19~29.

DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(99)00219-7

Google Scholar

[5] Huang Wei-ju, Chen Wen-mei, Wei Xing, Chen-Qun, numerical simulation on three dimensional turbulent flow field in the tubular micro-with a rotary cross-flow, Chinese journal of mechanical engineering, 2003, 39(5).

DOI: 10.3901/jme.2003.05.027

Google Scholar