Application of PCA-CFAR-MNF to Image Enhancement for a UGV FLGPR

Article Preview

Abstract:

The UGV (Unmanned Ground Vehicle) FLGPR (Forward-Looking Ground Penetrating Radar) imaging model spatially variable characteristics lead to the relatively low image SCR (Signal-Clutter Ratio). In order to improve the image quality and improve the SCR, the coherence properties of the target in image sequences is used for image enhancement. That is, images from the same region at different time sequence are enhanced two times. First of all, CFAR (Constant False Alarm Rate) is a preliminary step to enhance the image sequence, and then PCA-CFAR-MNF enhancement algorithm is proposed: according to the iterative nature of the MNF (Maximum Noise Fraction), PCA (Principal Component Analysis) method is first used to transform selecting and then CFAR detection is used to estimate the image background in the iteration,. The measured data show that the proposed method not only keeping the target characteristics, but also have remarkable image enhancement effect, and have greatly improved SCR.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

656-660

Citation:

Online since:

July 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Smith L I. A tutorial on Principal Components Analysis. February 26, (2002)

Google Scholar

[2] Sinan B, John G, Unsupervised iterative detection of land mines in highly cluttered environments IEEE Transaction on Image Progressing, (2003), 12(5): 509-523.

DOI: 10.1109/tip.2003.812325

Google Scholar

[3] Gu Haiyan, Li Haitao, Yang Jinghui, remote sensing image fusion method based on the minimum noise fraction transformation. Land Resources Remote Sensing, (2007), 2 (2): 53-55. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[4] Sinan B, John G, Unsupervised iterative detection of land mines in highly cluttered environments. IEEE Transaction on Image Progressing, (2003), 12(5): 509-523.

DOI: 10.1109/tip.2003.812325

Google Scholar

[5] Bucciarelli T,Lombardo P,Tamburrini S. Optimum CFAR Detection Against Compound Gaussian Clutter with Partially Correlated Texture. IEE Proc Radar Sonar and Navigation(S1350-2395), (1996), 143(2):95-104.

DOI: 10.1049/ip-rsn:19960248

Google Scholar

[6] Kuttikkad S,Chellappa R. Non-Gaussian CFAR Techniques for Target Detection in High Resolution SAR Images Proceedings,IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 1994(ICIP-94), Austin, TX, USA, Nov 13-16, (1994), 1:910-914

DOI: 10.1109/icip.1994.413444

Google Scholar

[7] FANG Xue 1i, LIANG Dian nong, WANG Hong gang, HUANG Xiao tao, A CFAR Detection M ethod for Nonhomogeneous Environm ent in UW BSAR Image. JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, (2006), 10(3): 345-349. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[8] Fei Chu hong,Liu Ting,and Lampropoulos G,et a1.. Maxkov chain CFAR detection for polarimetric data using data fusion.IEEE conference proceedings on Digital Signal Processing, Santorini, Hellas, (2009):1-6.

DOI: 10.1109/icdsp.2009.5201102

Google Scholar

[9] Hu Wenlin, Wang Yongliang, Wang shouyong, A Robust CFAR Detector Based Ordered Statistic. Chinese Journal of Electronics, (2007), 35(3):530-533. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[10] Xu An, Jane Tao, HE Gu Xinfeng, Gu Xuefeng, An improved VI-CFAR detector,Signal Processing, (2011), 27(6), 926:931 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[11] Chenhua Jie, Zhang Yu, Lin Yuesong, The Adaptive CFAR Detection Algorithm Based on the Multiple Background Clutter Distribution Model, Opto-Electronic Engineering, (2011), 38(1), 117:126. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar