Justification of a Fire Model on Predicting Fire in Large Room

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fire models using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) are now popular design or evaluation tools as the computer’s development sharply. By those tools the thermal fire environment can be predicted in a ‘microscopic’ picture with air flow pattern, pressure and temperature contours. However, most of the fire models are only validated by some experiments not specially designed for such purpose, especially for large rooms. In this paper, an existing fire test was used to justify a fire model - FDS4.07 on predicting fires in large room. Smoke layer height and air temperatures inside the room were taken as the parameters. Functional analysis was applied to justify the predictions by the CFD model.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1103-1108

Citation:

Online since:

August 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] National Fire Protection Association, NFPA 5000 Building Construction and Safety Code, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, Mass, USA, (2003).

Google Scholar

[2] N.D. Pope, C.G. Bailey, Quantitative Comparison of FDS and Parametric Fire Curves with Post-Flashover Compartment Fire Test Data, Fire Safety Journal, (2006) 99-110.

DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2005.11.002

Google Scholar

[3] , Kjell Nireus, Per Werling, Effects of inlets on natural fire vents (an experimental study). National Defence Research Establishment Department of Weapons and Protection, Sweden, (1996).

Google Scholar

[4] K.B. McGrattan, G.P. Forney, Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 4) – User's Guide, NIST Special Publication 1019, National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce, (2005).

Google Scholar

[5] K.B. McGrattan, Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 4) – Technical reference Guide, NIST Special Publication 1018, National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce. (2005).

Google Scholar

[6] R.D. Peacock, P.A. Reneke, W.D. Davis, W.W. Jones, Quantifying Fire Model Evaluation Using Functional Analysis, Fire Safety Journal, 33(1999) 167-184.

DOI: 10.1016/s0379-7112(99)00029-6

Google Scholar

[7] W.K. Chow, S.S. Li, Y. Gao, C.L. Chow, Numerical Studies on Atrium Smoke Movement and Control with Validation by Field Tests, Building and Environment, 44(2009) 1150-1155.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.08.008

Google Scholar