Research on the Mechanism of Fatigue Crack Initiation of X60 Pipeline Steel after Per-Tension Deformation

Article Preview

Abstract:

It is impossible to keep pipelines free from defects in the manufacturing, installation and servicing processes. In this paper, pre-tension deformation of X60 pipeline steel was employed to experimentally simulate the influence of dents and the mechanism of fatigue crack initiation of X60 pipeline steel after per-tension deformation under cyclic loading were investigated. The results indicate that the mechanism of fatigue crack initiation is the typical cleavage fracture characteristics and the cracks mainly initiates from the non-metallic inclusions which was the local brittle fracture materials such as MnS inclusion. With the pre-tension deformation increase, the yield strength of the matrix was increased and the toughness decreased due to the work-hardening effect. With the effects of the non-metallic inclusions larger, the fatigue cracks initiated from the non-metallic inclusions easier.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

798-801

Citation:

Online since:

September 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Cosham A. and Hopkins P., in: The pipeline defect assessment manual, Fourth international pipeline conference, Pergamon, New York(2002) , in press.

DOI: 10.1115/ipc2002-27067

Google Scholar

[2] Meibao Chen and Yurong Jiang: Progress in Safety Science and Technology Vol. VII (2008), p. (1919).

Google Scholar

[3] Leis B.N. and Francini R. B., in: Final report on project PR 3-9305 to the Line Pipe Research Supervisory Committee of the Pipeline Research Council International, (1999).

Google Scholar

[4] Edward D.C.: Engineering Research Station, Report 4080(1988), p.55.

Google Scholar

[5] Hopkins P. and Corbin P., in: NG-18/EPRG seventh joint biennial technical meeting on line pipe research, Calgary, Alta., Canada, (1988).

Google Scholar

[6] Miller A.G.: Int. J. Press Vessel Piping Vol. 32(1988), p.191.

Google Scholar

[7] Maxey W.A., in: NG-18 Report No. 162. AGA Catalogue No. L51518, Battelle, (1986).

Google Scholar

[8] Fowler J.R., Katsounas A.T. and Boubenider R., in: The America Gas Association Offshore Supervisory Committee and Pipeline Research Committee, AGA(1992), p.201.

Google Scholar

[9] Fowler J.R., Alexander C.R., Kovach P.J. and Connelly L.M., in: EPRG/PRC 10th Biennial Joint Technical Meeting on Pipeline Research, Proceedings, vol. 1, Cambridge, UK(1995), pp.15-1.

Google Scholar

[10] Batisse R., Meziere Y., Mokhdani C. and Pineau A., in: EPRG/PRC 10th Biennial Joint Technical Meeting on Pipeline Research, Proceedings, vol. 1, Cambridge, UK(1995), pp.16-1.

Google Scholar

[11] Xiulin Zheng : Int. J. Fatigue Vol. 23(2001), p.751.

Google Scholar

[12] Yong Zhong, Yiyin Shan, Furen Xiao, et al.: Material Letters Vol. 59(2005), p.1780.

Google Scholar

[13] Meibao Chen and Rong Wang: Materials for Mechanical Engineering Vol. 28 (2004), p.18 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[14] Xiulin Zheng, in: Quantitative Theory of Metal Fatigue, Northwest Industrial University press, Xi An(1994), in press. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[15] Meibao Chen and Yurong Jiang: Advanced Materials Research Vol. 311-313 (2011), p.841.

Google Scholar

[16] Meibao Chen and Yurong Jiang: Advanced Materials Research Vol. 284-286 (2011), p.1148.

Google Scholar