Research of Compensating Weights of Cascade Hydropower Stations

Article Preview

Abstract:

The compensation benefits distribution weights model of cascade hydropower stations has been proposed. The method of compensation weights calculation has been discussed. The subjective weights in the station indexes are calculated by analytic hierarchy process and the objective weights by variance coefficient and the combination weights by Topsis. The calculation results will be evaluated. The increased benefits of the system will be distributed by the objective weights. The enthusiasm for electric energy production of each station will be increased because they can receive compensations from the whole increased benefits.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

721-725

Citation:

Online since:

September 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Li Na, Mei Yadong, Gao Shichun: Optimal Scheduling Model for Extra Power Generation Among Cascade Hydropower Stations. Huazhong University of Science and Technology Journal (Natural Science Version), 2008(7), Vol 36, No 7) 60-62.

Google Scholar

[2] Mei Yadong: The Effective Dynamic Scheme Model and Application for Cascade Power Station Optimal Scheduling. Journal of Water Science Trend, 2000(11): 194-198.

Google Scholar

[3] Yang Weicheng: Conflict model and analysis of compensation benefit allocation of river basin cascade reservoirs. Journal of Economics of Water Resources, 2009(5), Vol. 27 No. 2: 24-27.

Google Scholar

[4] Li Jinpeng, Wang Yongxiang, Guo Zhaohui: Group Consistency Coordinated Programming Method for Allocating Compensation Benefits of Cascaded Hydropower Stations. Water Resources and Power. Jul. 2010, Vol. 28 No. 7: 138-141.

Google Scholar

[5] Wu Yonggang; Wang Xianqi, Pei Zheyi: Allocation Method of Compensation Benefits among Hydropower Plants in Electricity Market. Water Power, Water Power, 2006(10) Vol. 32. No. 10: 17-20.

Google Scholar