On the Accuracy of Inverse Evaluating Heat Transfer Coefficient

Article Preview

Abstract:

Together with Finite Difference Method, The sequential function method set up a mathematical model for inverse heat transfer problem, solving interface heat transfer coefficient for water cooled metal. Discussion on results indicates that the selection of time step throw striking influence on the evaluation accuracy, especially when the surface heat transfer coefficient experiences a drastic variation. A proper value of time step is confirmed to be 0.01s, where lies comparatively an acceptable error, being 0.37%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1504-1509

Citation:

Online since:

January 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Beck J V, Blackwell B and Jr. Clair C R S: Inverse Heat Conduction-I11-Posed Problems (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1985).

Google Scholar

[2] Sjostrom S: Mater. Sci. and Tech. Vol. 1(1985), pp.823-827.

Google Scholar

[3] Chantasiriwan S: Heat and Mass Transfer Vol. 43 (2000), pp.4275-4285.

Google Scholar

[4] Taler J, Zima W: Heat and Mass Transfer Vol. 42 (1999), pp.1123-1140.

Google Scholar

[5] Osman A M, Beck J V: Journal of Heat Transfer Vol. 112 (1990), pp.843-848.

Google Scholar

[6] Archambault P, Azim A: Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Vol. 4 (6) (1995), pp.730-736.

Google Scholar

[7] HOU Zhong-lin, YAO Shan and JIN Jun-ze: Trans. of Mater. And Heat Treatment Vol. 29 (1) (2008), pp.157-161. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] GU Jian-feng, PAN Jian-sheng: Hot Working Tech Vol. 5 (1998), pp.13-14. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar