Study on the Evaluation Model of Image Definition

Article Preview

Abstract:

At present, the usual image definition evaluation methods are poor in focusing precision and have a lot of calculations. In view of these problems, the paper analyzed the factors affecting an image quality evaluation, and proposed two evaluation models based on an image contrast change rate and an autocorrelation function. These methods avoided efficiently the phenomenon of partial peaks of focusing-function curves for noise disturbing. The stimulant test proves that the focusing curve of the evaluation model in the paper has many advantages, such as good focusing performance, strong antijamming ability, good real time and so on.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

636-640

Citation:

Online since:

January 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Vollath, D: Automatic focusing by correlative methods. J. Microsc, Vol. 147(1987), pp.279-288.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1987.tb02839.x

Google Scholar

[2] Vollath, D: The influence of the scene parameters and of noise on the behaviour of automatic focusing algorithms. J. Microsc, Vol. 151(1988), pp.133-146.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1988.tb04620.x

Google Scholar

[3] A. Santos, C. Ortizde Solorzano, J. J. Vaquero, J. M. Pena, N. Malpica and F. Delpozo: Evaluation of autofocus functions in molecular autogenetic. Journal of Microscopy, Vol. 188(1997), pp.264-272.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2818.1997.2630819.x

Google Scholar

[4] M. Subbarao, T. S. Choi, and A. Nikzad: Focusing techniques. Optical Engineering, Vol. 32(1993), pp.2824-2836.

Google Scholar

[5] Firestone, L. Cook, K. Culp, K. Talsania, N. Preston: Comparison of autofocus methods for automated microscopy. Cytometry, Vol. 12(1991), pp.195-206.

DOI: 10.1002/cyto.990120302

Google Scholar