Application Effect Evaluation of Equivalent Linearization Method Used in Displacement-Based Design of Bridge Piers

Article Preview

Abstract:

Six equivalent linearization methods are summarized and calculation process of applying equivalent linearization method for displacement-based design of bridge engineering is studied. With the evaluation of volume stirrup ratio and safety performance of design structure, six different equivalent linearization methods are used in displacement-based design of bridge columns. The influence of equivalent linearization model and the damping adjust coefficient to seismic design results is studied. Study shows that there are big differences among the seismic design results based on different equivalent linearization methods. Equivalent damping ratio model and the damping adjust coefficient have great influence on seismic design results. Calculation errors of Kowalsky method and Iwan method and Ou method are very small. Calculation error of Kowalsky method is decreasing when displacement ductility factor increases. The calculated result based on the damping adjust coefficient provided by Eurocode8 specification is more close to the real one. Kowalsky method and the damping adjust coefficient of Eurocode8 specification is recommended to be used in displacement-based design of bridge engineering.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2139-2147

Citation:

Online since:

October 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Muto K. etc. Non-linear Response Analysis and Application to Earthquake Resistant Design [A]. Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering(2WCEE)[C]. Japan,1960: 649-668.

Google Scholar

[2] Shimazaki K., Sozen M A. Seismic Drift of Reinforced Concrete Structures. Special Research Paper. Tokyo: 1985.

Google Scholar

[3] Kowalsky M J,Priestley M J N,Maerae G A. Displacement-based Design of RC Bridge Columns in seismic regions [J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,1995, 24(12):1623-1643.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290241206

Google Scholar

[4] Kowalsky M J. Deformation limit states for circular reinforced concrete bridge columns [J].Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE,2000, 126(8): 869-878.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2000)126:8(869)

Google Scholar

[5] American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, Division Ⅰ-A Seismic Design, Sixteenth Edition,1996.

Google Scholar

[6] Iwan W D. Estimating inelastic response spectra from elastic spectra [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1980, 8(4): 375-388.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290080407

Google Scholar

[7] Hwang J S. Evaluation of Equivalent Linear Analysis Methods of Bridge Isolation [J].Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 1996,122 (8):872-976.

Google Scholar

[8] Iwan W D,Gates N C. Estimating earthquake response of simple hysteretic structures [J].Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, 1979, 105 (3): 391-405.

DOI: 10.1061/jmcea3.0002481

Google Scholar

[9] Ou Jinping,Wu Bin,Long Xu.Aseismic Design Methods of Passive Energy Dissipation Systems[J].Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,1998,18(2):98-107.

Google Scholar

[10] Eurocode8. Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures[S]. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 1994.

Google Scholar

[11] Chinese specification of Guidelines for Seismic Design of Highway Bridges (JTG/T B02-01-2008), P. R. China. Ministry of transport. 2008.

Google Scholar

[12] Zhou Daochuan,Chen Guorong,Nie Liying.Study of Displacement-based seismic design method for RC Bridge Piers [J].Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2009,26(10):87~92+99.

Google Scholar