Buildings Setbacks Research From Surface-Fault-Rupture Statistical Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the author and others scientific investigation on China Wenchuan Ms8.0 earthquake, China Yushu Ms7.1 earthquake and "China's active fault surveying and earthquake hazard evaluation project" relevant data results and the world requirements about project setback of active faults, etc., this paper concluded that: (1) width of Surface-Fault-Rupture is about 40m by statistics, or from the main surface rupture trace about 20m; (2) width of Surface-Fault-Rupture S and the fault vertical offset V, statistical diagrams and formulas S=8.72+9.01V; (3) Setback of the main surface trace D and buildings from damage index I, statistical diagrams and formulas I=0.7969-0.00231D; (4) based on the first three results and by the actual statistics of accuracy, we get three active fault location accuracy level of the standard i, ii, iii, respectively, the error is ± 5m, ± 25m, ± 60m, also, can give this level of standards of Surface-Fault-Rupture width to the actual engineering applications.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2410-2418

Citation:

Online since:

October 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Crone A.J., Hailer K.M. : Struct. Geo1. 13: 2(1991), p.151

Google Scholar

[2] McCalpin J.P., in: Recommended setback distances from active normal faults. In Proceedings of the 23rd Symposium on Engineering Geology and Soils Engineering (1987), p.35

Google Scholar

[3] Xiwei Xu, Guihua Yu, Wentao Ma, etal: Seismology and Geology. 24: 4(2002), p.470 (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[4] Yongshuang Zhang, Ping Sun, Jiusong, Shi etal: Journal of Engineering Geology. 18:3(2010), p.312 (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[5] Rongjun Zhou, Runqiu Huang, Jiancheng Lei, etal: Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering. 27:11(2008), p.2172 (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[6] Jisheng Zhao, Jingfa Wu Lijing Shi, etal: Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 29:6(2009), p.95 (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[7] Jianyi Zhang, Jinshan Bo, ping Li, etal: Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. 30:6(2010), p.24 (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[8] European Committee for Standardization: Eurocode 8-Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 5 - Foundations, retaining structures, and geotechnical aspects. (2006)

DOI: 10.3403/03244357

Google Scholar

[9] Hart Earl W, Bryant William A, in: Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act with Index to Earthquake Fault Zones Maps, edtied by Division of Mines and Geology, California(1999).

DOI: 10.2113/gseegeosci.16.1.7

Google Scholar

[10] Christenson Gary E, Darlene Batatian L, Nelson Craig V, in: Guidelines for Evaluating Surface-Fault-Rupture in Utah, edtied by Geological Survey, Utah (2003).

Google Scholar

[11] Perrin N D, Wood P R, in: Defining the Wellington Fault within the Urban area of Wellington City, edtied by Institute of Geological & Nuclear Science Client, Wellington (2003).

Google Scholar

[12] MOHURD, in: Code for seismic design of buildings, edtied by Construction Industry Press, Beijing (2010).

Google Scholar

[13] Zhizhang Chai, Guangkui Meng, Guiren Ma, in: Active fault exploration and seismic hazard assessment in Yinxia city, edtied by Science Press, Beijing (2005).

Google Scholar

[14] China Earthquake Administration, in: Stipulation on technical system for China earthquake activity fault surveying JSGC-04-2005, edtied by Seismological Press, Beijing (2005).

Google Scholar