International Comparison of Carbon Dioxide Emissions From Fuel Combustion of BRICS

Article Preview

Abstract:

Based on the latest national carbon dioxide emissions data released from the International Energy Agency (IEA), the carbon dioxide emissions trends of BRICS were analyzed in three aspects: the total carbon dioxide emissions, the emission intensity calculated using purchasing power parties (PPP) and per capita carbon dioxide emissions. The results show that the total carbon dioxide emissions among BRICS presented an increasing trend in different extent. On the other hand, the emission intensity calculated using PPP of BRICS showed a decreasing trend. The per capita carbon dioxide emissions of BRICS also presented an increasing trend in different extent. The Russian Federation and South Africa’s per capita carbon dioxide emissions were higher than the World’s average level, whilst those of India, Brazil and China were lower than the World’s average level, which is far less than the level of the OECD countries.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1607-1610

Citation:

Online since:

October 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] HE Jiankun, LIU Bin. Analysis of carbon emission intensity as the main index for greenhouse gas emission mitigation commitments [J]. Tsinghua Univ., Vol. 44, No. 6: 740-743 (2004).

Google Scholar

[2] IEA. CO2 Emission from Fuel Combustion [M]. Paris: International Energy Agency, (2010).

Google Scholar

[3] IEA. World Energy Outlook 2009 [M]. Paris: International Energy Agency, (2009).

Google Scholar

[4] IPCC. Climate Change 2007:Mitigation of Climate Change [M]. United Kingdom:Cambridge University Press, (2007).

Google Scholar

[5] LV Lianhong, LUO Hong. Comparative Study of Energy Consumption in BRICs [J]. Energy of China, 31, (9): 27-29. (2009).

Google Scholar

[6] WANG Yongzhong, YAO Zhizhong. BRICS Summit Agenda, Participants' Positions and Policy Suggestions for China [J]. International Economic Review, 3: 74-83. (2011).

Google Scholar