New York Metropolitan Vicinity-Ideas in Integrating Changchun and Jilin

Abstract:

Regional integration will promote the flow of elements in accordance with Regional Economics, to achieve the most optimal configuration. In 2007, the Jilin Provincial Government made a strategic plan about Changchun-Jilin Integration, however, we don’t have much more experiences in China, so that this thesis analyzes the US New York Metropolitan Vicinity and indicates three outstanding features as follows: First, the evolution of planning tend to be people-oriented, focusing on the harmonious development between human and nature; Second, to build multi-level coordination and management mechanism, the semi-official organizations have the largest contribution to the development of metropolitan; Third, the evolution of the industrial structure tend to be third tilt with a larger proportion of modern service industry. Changchun-Jilin Integration should develop appropriation strategies plan based on above findings and domestic background.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 209-211)
• Pages: 553-558
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.209-211.553
• Online since: October 2012
• Authors: Hong Wei Su, Guang Yuan Zhang
• Keywords: Changchun-Jilin Integration, Coordination Mechanism, Industrial Structure, US New York Metropolitan Vicinity

References

[1] Berry, B.J.L. Long Waves in American Urban Evolution, in J. F. Hart (ed.), Our Changing Cities[M]Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press,1999,p.31–50.

[2] Stephens, G. R., & Wikstrom, N. American Inter governmental Relations: A Fragmented Federal Polity[M]New York: Oxford University Press,(2007)

[3] Scheppach, R. C., & Shafroth, F. Intergovernmental finance in the new world economy: An integrated approach[M]Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press,pp.42-76

[4] Meyer， John R.， J.F. Kain，and M. Wohl, The Urban Transportation Problem[M]Harvard University Press,(1965)

[5] Abu-Lughod, J. L. New York, Chicago, Los Angeles: America's Global Cities. Minneapolis[M]MN: University of Minnesota Press,(1995)

DOI: 10.1086/343154

[6] Benjamin J Klebaner.New York City's changing Economic Base[M]PICA Press,(1981)

[7] Mitchell-Weaver, C., Miller, D., & Deal, R., Jr., Multilevel governance and metropolitan regionalism in the USA[J]Urban Studies, 2000,37(5-6):851-876.

DOI: 10.1080/00420980050011127

[8] Samuel M Ehrenhalt, Economic and demographic change, the case of New York City [J] Monthly labor Review, 1993(2):23-34.

[9] Mitchell-Weaver, C., Miller, D., & Deal, R., Jr., Multilevel governance and metropolitan regionalism in the USA[J]Urban Studies, 2000,37(5-6):851-876.

DOI: 10.1080/00420980050011127

[10] Samuel M Ehrenhalt,Economic and demographic change, the case of New York City [J]Monthly labor Review,1993(2):23-34.

[11] Cain L.P. Historical Perspective on Infrastructure and US Economic Development[J]Regional Science and Urban Economics,1997 (27):117-138.

DOI: 10.1016/s0166-0462(96)02148-5

[12] Rohr,R. and Williams,I. Modelling the Regional Impacts of the Channel Tunnel[J]Environment and Planning,1994（21）:555-567.

DOI: 10.1068/b210555

[13] Alderson, A. S. and Beck field, J. Power and Position in the World City System[J]American Journal of Sociology,2004(109)：811–851.

DOI: 10.1086/378930

[14] Berry, B. J. L., and Garrison, W. L. The Functional Bases of the Central Place Hierarchy[J]Economic Geography,1958(b34)：145–154.

DOI: 10.2307/142299

[15] Batten D. F., Network Cities： Creative Urban Agglomerations for the 21st Century[J]Urban Studies,1995(32)：313–327.

DOI: 10.1080/00420989550013103

[16] Gordon, Peter, Ajay Kumar, and Harry W. Richardson, The Influence of Metropolitan Spatial Structure on Commuting Time[J]Journal of Urban Economics,1989(26),pp.138-151.

DOI: 10.1016/0094-1190(89)90013-2