Study on Short-Term Scheduling of Day-Controlled Hydropower Station Base on the Minimum Range of Stage

Article Preview

Abstract:

Base on the peak-load adjustment of the upper station and the consideration of downstream flow for shipping requirement, a minimum range of stage model, which is suitable for the day-controlled hydropower station, has been proposed in this paper. Taking certain hydropower station as an example, the minimum range of stage model has been studied in this paper with the dynamic programming method. And the results show that, although there would be a little losing of electric generated energy, the range of stage will be minimum fluctuation and the electric output process smooth through all the time, which means that the minimum range of stage model is suitable for the requirements of day-controlled hydropower station.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1076-1080

Citation:

Online since:

October 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] P. Masse: Les Reserves et la Regulation de Lavenir dans La Vie Economique. Hemrann, Paris, 1946.

Google Scholar

[2] J. D.C. Little: The Use of Storage Water in a Hydroelectric System. Operation Research, 1955.3(2), 187-197.

Google Scholar

[3] Howard: Dynamic Programming and Markov Processes. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1960.

Google Scholar

[4] Moran: A Probability Theory of Dams and Storage: Modification of the Release Rule. Australian J. of Applied Science, 1955(6).

Google Scholar

[5] R. E. Bellman: Applied Dynamic Programming. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1962.

Google Scholar

[6] C. B. Rusell: An Optimal Policy of Operating a Multipurpose Reservoir. Oper. Res. 1972, 20(6): 1181-1189.

Google Scholar

[7] M. J. Sobel. Reservoir Management Models. Water Resour. Res., 1975, 11(6):767-777.

Google Scholar

[8] X.Fan, Y.Wu, S.Zhang: Design and Development of Hydropower Scheduling Dss. Dam Observation and Geotechnical Tests, 2003, 27(3): 74-76.

Google Scholar