Numerical Simulation on Hazardous Area Distribution after Gas Outburst in Coal Uncovering Construction of Hydropower Station

Article Preview

Abstract:

The dynamic risk of underground cavities after gas outburst in coal uncovering construction of hydropower station was emphatically analyzed. The tunnel construction conditions in Xiangjiaba hydropower station were taken as an example. Based on the computational fluid dynamics theory and gas outburst theory, this paper used the ANSYS CFX CFD code to model the gas diffusion after gas outburst. The space-time characteristics of underground cavities dynamic risk were analyzed. The results show that the danger area ranges of gas explosion and asphyxia reach respectively the maximum value at about 140s and 50s. The influence range and duration of the former are significantly higher than the latter. The direction of hazardous area movement is mainly consistent with the air flow direction. ANSYS CFX simulation can visually display dynamic risk of underground cavities, and has a good prospect in gas hazard prevention in hydraulic and hydroelectric engineering.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

989-997

Citation:

Online since:

October 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Lei Zhang and Yuanxi Huang: Economic Geography. Vol. 29 (2009), pp.1434-1440. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[2] Xiaobing Kang, Mo Xu: Yangtze River. Vol. 42 (2011), pp.30-33. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[3] Bufan Yu: Coal and gas outburst mechanism (Coal industry press, Beijing, 1985).(In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[4] Qixiang Yu: Mine gas prevention (China University of Mining and Technology Press, Xuzhou, 1993).(In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[5] Xueqiu He, Enyuan Wang, Baisheng Nie, et al: Electromagnetic dynamics of coal or rock rheology (Science press, Beijing, 2003). (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[6] Valliappan, S.: Fuel. Vol.39 (1998), p.875–895.

Google Scholar

[7] Chenggong Cai: Journal of China Coal Society. Vol. 29(2004), pp.66-67.(In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[8] Renqiang Wang, Ping Yang: Water resources and hydropower engineering. Vol. 33 (2002), pp.46-47. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[9] Qixiang Fan: Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering. Vol. 30(2011), pp.666-676.(In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[10] Xin Wang: Journal of Liaoning Technical University (Natural Science). Vol.30(2011), pp.25-31.(In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[11] Litwiniszyn J: Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr. Vol. 22(1985), p.39–46.

Google Scholar

[12] T. Xu, C.A. Tang, T.H. Yang, W.C. Zhu, J. Liu: Internal Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science. Vol. 43 (2006), pp.905-919.

Google Scholar

[13] A. Luketa-Hanlin, R.P. Koopman, D.L. Ermak: J. Hazard. Mater. Vol. 140 (2007), p.504–517.

Google Scholar

[14] Kai Wanga, Aitao Zhou, Jianfang Zhang, et al: Safet y science, Vol. 50(2012), pp.835-841.

Google Scholar

[15] F. Otuonye and J. Sheng: Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. Vol. 12(1994), pp.15-34.

Google Scholar

[16] Fujun Wang: Computational fluid dynamics analysis-CFD Principal and Application (Qinghua University press, Beijing, 2004). (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[17] Gangfeng Dong,Yunpei Liang: Coal Science and Tecnology Magazine. Vol. 4 (2001), pp.46-48.(In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[18] Xusheng Zhao, Kaiwu Liang: Coal Science and Tecnology. Vol. 36(2008), pp.67-70.(In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[19] Chunli Yang, Qi Liu and Chunyan Yang: Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology. Vol.31(2011), pp.728-744.(In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[20] Bufan Yu: Technical manual of gas hazard prevention and use (revised edition) (Coal industry press, Beijing,1995).(In Chinese)

Google Scholar