Synchronization Control of High Speed Tracked Vehicle with Hydrostatic Drive

Article Preview

Abstract:

A synchronization control strategy with cross-coupling concept for tracked vehicle with hydrostatic drive is developed and compared with a leader-following control strategy, aiming to achieve stable straight running. Associating with the basic controller, the two kinds of synchronization controllers are designed. Dynamic system model containing the control strategy for entire tracked vehicle is modeled in MATLAB/Simulink, the results of simulation indicate that, compared with leader-following control strategy, the cross-coupling strategy can restrain synchronization error more effectively and make the system more stable obviously under external disturbances by coordinates the motion of two drive loops simultaneously.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1679-1685

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Andreas K, Kurt S, Heinz A, et al. Modeling and simulation of a hydrostatic transmission with variable-displacement pump, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol.53, no.4~6, p.409~414, (2000)

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4754(00)00234-2

Google Scholar

[2] Lynn,E. Smid, M. Eshraghi, CaldwellN. Modeling Hydraulic Regenerative Hybrid Vehicles Using AMESim and Matlab/Simulink, Proceedings of SPIE The International Society for Optical Engineering, p.24~40, (2005)

DOI: 10.1117/12.603712

Google Scholar

[3] Pourmovahed, A., Beachley, N.H., and Fronczak, F.J. Modeling of a Hydraulic Energy Regeneration System—Part I: Analytical Treatment, Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control, vol.114, no.3, p.155~159, (1992)

DOI: 10.1115/1.2896497

Google Scholar

[4] Tanner, H. G., Loizou, S. G., and Kyriakopoulos, K. J. Nonholonomic Navigation and Control of Cooperating Mobile Manipulators, IEEE Trans.Rob. Autom., 19(1), p.53–64. (2003)

DOI: 10.1109/tra.2002.807549

Google Scholar

[5] Huang, J. Y., Farritor, S. M., Qadi, A., and Goddard, S. Localization and Follow-the-Leader Control of a Heterogeneous Group of Mobile Robots, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., 11(2), p.205–215. (2006)

DOI: 10.1109/tmech.2006.871100

Google Scholar

[6] Koren, Y. Cross-Coupled Bixaial Computer Control for Manufacturing System, ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 102(12), p.265–272. (1980)

Google Scholar

[7] Liu, H. T., Shan, J., and Sun, D. Adaptive Synchronization Control of Multiple Spacecraft Formation Flying, ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 129(3), p.337–342. (2007)

DOI: 10.1115/1.2719772

Google Scholar

[8] Ren, L., Mills, J. K., and Sun, D. Adaptive Synchronized Control for a Planar Parallel Manipulator: Theory and Experiments, ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 128(4), p.976–979. (2006)

DOI: 10.1115/1.2363200

Google Scholar

[9] Chung, S., Ahsun, U., and Slotine, J. E. Application of Synchronization to Formation Flying Spacecraft: Lagrangian Approach, J. Guid. Control Dyn.,32(2), p.512–526. (2009)

DOI: 10.2514/1.37261

Google Scholar

[10] Torsten Kohmäscher, Robert Rahmfeld, Hubertus Murrenhoff. Improved loss modeling of hydrostatic units-requirement for precise simulation of mobile working machine drivelines, IMECE2007-ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Seattle, Washington, USA, November. (2007)

DOI: 10.1115/imece2007-41803

Google Scholar

[11] Triet Hung HO, Kyoung Kwan AHN. Modeling and simulation of hydrostatic transmission system with energy regeneration using hydraulic accumulator, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol.24, no.5, p.1163 ~1175. (2010)

DOI: 10.1007/s12206-010-0313-8

Google Scholar