Bonding-Antibonding Ground States Transition in Coupled Quantum Dots

Nai Yun Tang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.220-223.2017

Paper Titles

Influence of Machining Process on Gap-Width Detection in Pulse ECM
p.2000

A Satisfaction-Based Dynamic Bandwidth Allocation Algorithm for Heterogeneous Wireless Network
p.2004

Design of the Function Units of Electronic Password Lock
p.2008

Layered Space-Time Multi-User Detection Based on Kalman Filter
p.2012

Bonding-Antibonding Ground States Transition in Coupled Quantum Dots
p.2017

Design and Application of Wireless Mesh Network Based on ZigBee Pro
p.2022

Performance and Structure of an EMP Simulator
p.2027

The Research and Implementation of USB Communication Interface Circuit Based on FPGA
p.2032

Large-Scale Analog Circuit Evolutionary Design Using a Real-Coded Scheme
p.2036

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 220-223Bonding-Antibonding Ground States Transition in...

Bonding-Antibonding Ground States Transition in Coupled Quantum Dots

Abstract:

The two lowest single-particle hole states in two vertically coupled quntum dots (CQDs) are investigated by using the six-band k • p model. A bonding–antibonding ground-state transition is observed with an increasing interdot distance. This result is counterintuitive since the antibonding molecular ground state is never observed in natural diatomic molecules. By comparing the wavafunction component of hole, the results verify that the reordering of bonding and antibonding orbitals with an increasing interdot distance is caused by spin–orbit interaction of holes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 220-223)

Pages:

2017-2021

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.220-223.2017

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2012

Authors:

Nai Yun Tang

Keywords:

Antibonding Ground State, Coupled Quantum Dot

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] W. G. van der Wiel, S. De Franceschi, J. M. Elzerman, T.Fujisawa, S. Tarucha, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Rev. Mod. Phys.75 (2002) pp.1-22

DOI: 10.1103/revmodphys.75.1

Google Scholar

[2] M. Scheibner, A. S. Bracker, D. Kim, and D. Gammon, Solid State Commun. 149 (2009) p.1427.

Google Scholar

[3] G. Burkard, G. Seelig, and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B 62 (2000) pp.581-593

Google Scholar

[4] E. A. Stinaff, M. Schneibner, A. S. Bracker, I. V. Ponomarev, V.L. Korenev, M. E. Ware, M. F. Doty, T. L. Reinecke, and D.Gammon, Science 311 (2006) pp.636-639

DOI: 10.1126/science.1121189

Google Scholar

[5] M. F. Doty, J. I. Climente, A. Greilich, M. Yakes, A. S. Bracker,and D. Gammon, Phys. Rev. B 81 (2010) pp.035308-8.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.81.035308

Google Scholar

[6] Yakimov A I, Bloshkin A A and Dvurechenskii A V Phys. Rev. B 78 (2008) pp.165310-4

Google Scholar

[7] Bester G, Zunger A and Shumway J Phys. Rev. B 71 (2005) pp.075325-13

Google Scholar

[8] Climente J I, Korkusinski M, Goldoni G and Hawrylak P Phys. Rev. B 78 (2008) pp.115323-12

Google Scholar

[9] Jask´olski W, Zieli´nski M, Bryant G W and Aizpurua J Phys. Rev. B 74 (2006) pp.195339-11

Google Scholar

[10] http://www.nextnano.de/nextnano3/

Google Scholar

[11] M. Korkusinski, P. Hawrylak, M. Bayer, G. Ortner, A. Forchel, S. Fafard, and Z. Wasilewski, Physica E _Amsterdam 13 (2002) pp.610-615

DOI: 10.1016/s1386-9477(02)00198-4

Google Scholar

[12] Q. R. Dong, S. S. Li, Z. C. Niu, and S. L. Feng, Physica E_Amsterdam 33 (2006) pp.230-239

Google Scholar