Spray Characteristics of Swirl Effervescent Injector in Rocket Application: A Review

Abstract:

Injector is one of the vital devices in liquid rocket engine (LRE) as small changes in its configurations and design can result in significantly different LRE performance. Characteristics of spray such as spray cone angle, breakup length and Sauter mean diameter (SMD) are examples of crucial parameters that play the important role in the performance of liquid propellant rocket engine. Wider spray cone angle is beneficial for widespread of fuel in the combustion chamber for fast quiet ignition and a shorter breakup length provides shorter combustion chamber to be utilized and small SMD will result in fast and clean combustion. There are several mechanisms of liquid atomization such as swirling, e.g. jet swirl atomization or introducing bubbles into the liquid and effervescent atomization. Introducing a swirl component in the flow can enhance the propellant atomization and mixing whereas introducing bubbling gas directly into the liquid stream inside the injector leads to finer sprays even at lower injection pressures. This paper reviews the influence of both operating conditions and injector internal geometries towards the spray characteristics of swirl effervescent injectors. Operating conditions reviewed are injection pressure and gas-to-liquid ratio (GLR), while the injector internal geometries reviewed are limited to swirler geometry, mixing chamber diameter (d_c), mixing chamber length (l_c), aeration hole diameter (d_a), discharge orifice diameter (d_o) and discharge orifice length (l_o).

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 225)
• Pages: 423-428
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.225.423
• Online since: November 2012
• Authors: Zulkifli Abdul Ghaffar, Ahmad Hussein Abdul Hamid, Mohd Syazwan Firdaus Mat Rashid
• Keywords: Breakup Length, SMD, Spray Cone Angle, Swirl Effervescent

References

[1] S. Pandey and A. Kushari, A Controllable Twin-Fluid Internally Mixed Swirl Atomizer, Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering. 1 (2008) 45-50

DOI: 10.2174/2212797610801010045

[2] George P. Sutton and Oscar Biblarz, Rocket Propulsion Elements, seventh ed., John Wiley & Sons, Canada, 2001.

[3] M.A. Rahman, Scaling of Effervescent Atomization and Industrial Two-Phase Flow, Ph. D. thesis, University of Alberta, 2011.

[4] Arthur H. Lefebvre and Dilip R. Ballal, Gas Turbine Combustion (Alternative Fuels and Emissions), third ed., Taylor & Francis Group, Florida, 2010.

[5] J.D. Whitlow and A.H. Lefebvre, Experimental Studies on Effervescent Injectors with Wide Spray Angles, AGARD (Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development) Meeting on Fuels and Combustion Technology for Advanced Aircraft Engines, May 1993.

[6] J. Jedelsky and M. Jicha, Novel Modifications of Twin-fluid Injectors: Performance, Advantages and Drawbacks, ILASS – Europe 2010, 23rd Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Brno, Czech Republic, September 2010.

[7] Byung-Joon Rho, Shin-Jae Kang, Je-Ha Oh and Sam-Goo Lee, Swirl Effect on the Spray Characteristics of a Twin-Fluid Jet, KSME International Journal. 5 (1998) 899-906.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02945557

[8] F. Barreras, A. Lozano and J. Barroso, Experimental Characterization of Industrial Twin-Fluid Atomizers, Atomization and Sprays. 16 (2006) 127-145.

DOI: 10.1615/atomizspr.v16.i2.10

[9] J. Karnawat and A. Kushari, Controlled atomization using a twin-fluid atomizer, Experimental Fluids. 41 (2006) 649-663.

DOI: 10.1007/s00348-006-0191-0

[10] Sam-Goo and Lee, Experimental investigation of mixing-enhanced swirl flows, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 22 (2008) 2509-2515.

DOI: 10.1007/s12206-008-0910-y

[11] A.H.A Hamid, R. Atan, Spray Characteristics of jet-swirl nozzles for thrust chamber injector, Aerospace Science and Technology. 13 (2009) 192-196.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2008.10.003

[12] Digvijay B. Kulshreshtha, Saurabh B. Dikshit and S. A. Channiwala, Variations of Spray Cone Angle and Penetration Length of Pressure Swirl Atomizer Designed For Micro Gas Turbine Engine, International Journal of Dynamics of Fluids. 2 (2009) 165-172.

[13] S.D. Sovani, P.E. Sojka, A.H. Lefebvre, Effervescent atomization, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 27 (2001) 483-521.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1285(00)00029-0

[14] Huang. X, Wang. X, and Liao.G., Visualisation of Two Phase Flow inside an Effervescent Atomizer, Journal of Visualization. 11 (2008) 299-308.

DOI: 10.1007/bf03182198

[15] Jan Jedelsky, Miroslav Jicha, Jaroslav Slama, and Jan Otahal, Development of an Effervescent Atomizer for Industrial Burners, Energy and Fuels, 23 (2009) 6121-6130.

DOI: 10.1021/ef900670g

[16] L. Broniarz-Press, M. Ochowiak, S. Woziwodzki, Atomization of PEO aqueous solutions in effervescent atomizers, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow. 31 (2010) 651-658.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2010.02.005

[17] Hrishikesh P. Gadgil and B. N. Raghunandan "Some features of spray breakup in effervescent atomizers". Experimental Fluids. 50 (2011) 329–338.

DOI: 10.1007/s00348-010-0929-6

[18] Lefebvre, A. H., Atomization and Sprays, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York, 1989.