Adjusting the Transient Stability of Power System Using STATCOM-SMES Combined Compensator

Abstract:

Since most of the new FACTS devices are operating in compensating active and reactive power and most of the electrical energy saving systems have an acceptable operation in compensating active and reactive power, in this paper a combined compensator of STATCOM-SMES is introduced and is exploit in order to adjust the transient stability of power network. The purpose of this paper is analyzing the more effective operation of combined compensator of STATCOM-SMES comparing with STATCOM compensator, using an appropriate strategy in adjusting the transient stability. To do this, a single machine infinite bus is assumed as sample system and using combined compensator in sample power network, appropriate results are shown for adjusting transient stability. Simulations are carried out using PSCAD/EMTDC.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 229-231)
• Pages: 1115-1119
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.229-231.1115
• Online since: November 2012
• Authors: Jalil Ghahramani, Seyed Siavash Karimi Madahi
• Keywords: Compensator, FACTS Devices, Single Machine Infinite Bus, STATCOM-SMES, Transient Stability

References

[1] Q. Wei and R. G. Harley, in: Power Quality and Dynamic Performance Improvement of Wind Farms Using a STATCOM, in Power Electronics Specialists Conference, PESC 2007, IEEE Conference, pp.1832-1838, (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/pesc.2007.4342280

[2] M. G. Molina and P. E. Mercado, in: Comparative evaluation of performance of a STATCOM and SSSC both integrated with SMES for controlling the power system frequency, Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition: Latin America, IEEE/PES, pp.535-541, (2004).

DOI: 10.1109/tdc.2004.1432436

[3] S. Yuanzhang, H. Shan, R. Ortega and M. Galaz, in: Influence of transfer conductance on power system stability with excitation control, Power Engineering Society General Meeting, IEEE Conference, p.6, (2006).

DOI: 10.1109/pes.2006.1709069

[4] M. G. Molina, P. E. Mercado and E. H. Watanabe, in: Dynamic Performance of a Static Synchronous Compensator with Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage, in 36th Power Electronics Specialists Conference, PESC '05, IEEE Conference, pp.224-230, (2005).

DOI: 10.1109/pesc.2005.1581628

[5] M. Januszewski, J. Machowski and J. W. Bialek, in: Application of the direct Lyapunov method to improve damping of power swings by control of UPFC, Generation, Transmission and Distribution, IEE Proceedings, volume 151, pp.252-260, (2004).

DOI: 10.1049/ip-gtd:20040054

[6] A. Esmaieli, S. A. N. Niaki, A. Tajfar and H. Nademi, in: Unified modeling of UPFC-SMES in power system application, in Industrial Electronics and Applications, ICIEA 3rd, IEEE Conference, pp.2051-2056, (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/iciea.2008.4582881

[7] P. Bhatt, R. Roy and S. P. Ghoshal, in: Coordinated control of SSSC and SMES in competitive electricity market for load frequency control, in Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems - PMAPS 11th, IEEE International Conference, pp.42-47, (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/pmaps.2010.5529009

[8] M. A. Abido, A. T. Al-Awami and Y. L. Abdel-Magid, in: Simultaneous design of damping controllers and internal controllers of a unified power flow controller, in Power Engineering Society General Meeting, IEEE Conference, p.8, (2006).

DOI: 10.1109/pes.2006.1709297

[9] M. Ghandhari, G. Andersson and I. A. Hiskens, in: Control Lyapunov functions for controllable series devices, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, volume 16, pp.689-694, (2001).

DOI: 10.1109/59.962414

[10] F. Zhou, G. Joos, C. Abbey and J. Lianwei, in: Optimal state control for CSI superconducting magnetic energy storage system, in Power System Technology – PowerCon 2004, volume 2, pp.1072-1077, (2004).

DOI: 10.1109/icpst.2004.1460160