Study on Detection Methods for Chlorine Precipitation during Biomass and Coal Co-Combustion

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, three detection methods were analyzed to determine the chlorine precipitation from the flue gas: Silver nitrate volumetric analysis (SNVA), Volhard method (VM) and Mercuric thiocyanate spectrophotometric method (MTSM). Results indicated that SNVA and VM were simple and convenient, but unsuitable for the detection of blend fuel due to the high lower limit. MTSM was suitable for biomass and coal co-combustion for its low lower limit and high sensitivity. In addition, MTSM needed less sample solution, which made it more suitable for multiple measurements to reduce errors, and the maximum proportional error was only 3.5%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1423-1426

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Guan Qiao-yan, Liao Fu-lin, Luo Dong-sang: Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research Vol. 11 (2007), p.20, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Michael, J. W. Karl: Energy & Fuels Vol. 20 (2006), p.1444.

Google Scholar

[3] O. Holger, S. Annette: Fuel Vol. 86 (2007), p.2275.

Google Scholar

[4] Jiang Xu-guang, Li Xiang-pai: Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology Vol. 32 (2004), p.307, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[5] Li Xiao-dong, Yang Zhong-can: Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology Vol. 30 (2002), p.563, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[6] Hu Yong-feng: Environmental Science and Management Vol. 35 (2010), p.129, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[7] Liu Yan-mei: Environmental Science Survey Vol. 26 (2007), p.87, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[8] Li Yan-hong: Analytical Chemistry (Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing 2008), In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[9] Zhang Yu-qin: Guangdong Chemical Industry Vol. 37 (2010), p.226, In Chinese.

Google Scholar