Sub-Index Derivation of Welding Health-Hazard Index (WHI) for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Malaysia

Article Preview

Abstract:

Malaysia is a developing nation and the manufacturing sector is the major contributor to the Malaysian economy. In the year 2009, Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) contribute to 28,840 establishments which represented 94.2 percent of the total establishments in the manufacturing sector in Malaysia. Welding is a common industrial process in manufacturing sector that has both acute and long term chronic hazards mainly from the inhalable welding fumes. Welding fumes assessment in SMEs welding workplace is essential in order to ensure the minimum level of exposure is maintained as required by the prevailing standards. However, providing concentration or emission information alone is insufficient and meaningless to the workers and company management. There is an urgent need to develop an index which served as a ranking tool in comparing environmental condition at different location and to simplify complex health hazard issues of welding fumes that can be comprehended easily by the workers and company management. Preliminary ideas on the derivation of the sub-index from rating of health effect, mixture hazard, doses and weightage of metal fumes element were outlined in this paper. At the end of this paper, future works regarding aggregation factor and verification of the index were also discussed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2546-2550

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.M. Antonini, A.A. Afshari, S. Stone, B. Chen, D. Schwegler-Berry, W.G. Fletcher, W.T. Goldsmith, K.H. Vandestouwe, W. McKinney, V. Castranova, and D.G. Frazer, Design, Construction, and Characterization of a Novel Robotic Welding Fume Generator and Inhalation Exposure System for Laboratory Animals. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 3 (2006).

DOI: 10.1080/15459620600584352

Google Scholar

[2] Hajime Yamataki, Yasushi Suwazono, T. Yasushi Okubo, oshiaki Miyamoto, Mirei Uetani, E. Kobayashi, and K. Nogawa, Health Status of Workers in Small and Medium-Sized Companies as Compared to Large Companies in Japan. Journal of Occupational Health 48 (2006).

DOI: 10.1539/joh.48.166

Google Scholar

[3] D.J. Moschandreas, and S.C. Sofuoglu, The Indoor Environmental Index and Its Relationship with Symptoms of Office Building Occupants. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 54 (2004) 1440-1451.

DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2004.10470999

Google Scholar

[4] M. Mumtaz, Principle and Practice of Mixture Toxicology, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, (2010).

Google Scholar

[5] K. Neha, Measuring environmental quality: an index of pollution. Ecological Economics 35 (2000) 191-202.

Google Scholar

[6] D.K. Nims, Basics of Industrial Hygiene, John Wiley and Sons Inc., Canada, (1999).

Google Scholar

[7] NIOSH, NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, (2007).

Google Scholar

[8] G.F. Nordberg, B.A. Fowler, M. Nordberg, and L.T. Friberg, Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals, Elsevier, (2007).

Google Scholar

[9] W.R. Ott, (Ed. ), Environmental Indices Theory and Practise, Ann Arbor Science Publisher Inc., Michigan, (1978).

Google Scholar

[10] R. Sadiq, S.A. Haji, G. v. Cool, and M.J. Rodriguez, Using penalty functions to evaluate aggregation models for environmental indices. Journal of Environmental Management 91 (2010) 706-716.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.034

Google Scholar

[11] P.K. Swamee, and A. Tyagi, Describing water quality with aggregate index. ASCE Journal of Environment Engineering 126 (2000) 451-155.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(2000)126:5(451)

Google Scholar