Directional Pattern versus Omnidirectional Pattern of Switched Beamform Antennas for Asymptotic Connectivity

Article Preview

Abstract:

The connectivity of wireless networks is important for data transmission. Gupta and Kumar have already proved that if n nodes with omnidirectional antennas are located randomly, uniformly in a disk of unit area, the critical transmission range to achieve asymptotic connectivity is O( )[1]. In this work, we studied the network connectivity where nodes equipped with switched beamform antennas are randomly and uniformly distributed in a disc of unit area in R2, the antenna can be modeled in omnidirectional and directional patterns. We first assume that nodes in the network cooperate in routing each others’ packets without considering the scheduling, there exists critical transmission range to achieve asymptotic connectivity of the overall network, which responding to critical transmission power. Directional antennas are considered to be a viable solution for improving the network’s connectivity, However, we find that, without considering schedule, the smallest critical transmission range was obtained when omnidirectional antenna patterns were used in both the transmitter and receiver instead of directional antenna patterns in our model.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

147-151

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] P. Gupta and P. Kumar, Critical power for asymptotic connectivity, in Decision and Control, 1998. Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Conference on, vol. 1. IEEE, 1998, p.1106–1110.

Google Scholar

[2] O. Bazan and M. Jaseemuddin, A survey on mac protocols for wireless adhoc networks with beamforming antennas, Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE, no. 99, p.1–24.

DOI: 10.1109/surv.2011.041311.00099

Google Scholar

[3] R. Ramanathan, On the performance of ad hoc networks with beamforming antennas, in Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing. ACM, 2001, p.95–105.

DOI: 10.1145/501416.501430

Google Scholar

[4] P. Li, C. Zhang, and Y. Fang, Asymptotic connectivity in wireless ad hoc networks using directional antennas, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), vol. 17, no. 4, p.1106–1117, (2009).

DOI: 10.1109/tnet.2008.2006224

Google Scholar

[5] C. Bettstetter, C. Hartmann, and C. Moser, How does randomized beamforming improve the connectivity of ad hoc networks?, in Communications, 2005. ICC 2005. 2005 IEEE International Conference on, vol. 5. IEEE, 2005, p.3380–3385.

DOI: 10.1109/icc.2005.1495048

Google Scholar

[6] O. Dousse, F. Baccelli, and P. Thiran, Impact of interferences on connectivity in ad hoc networks, Networking, IEEE/ACM Transactions on, vol. 13, no. 2, p.425–436, (2005).

DOI: 10.1109/tnet.2005.845546

Google Scholar

[7] R. Janaswamy, Radiowave propagation and smart antennas for wireless communications. Springer Netherlands, 2001, vol. 599.

Google Scholar

[8] J. Carr, Directional or omnidirectional antenna, " Joe Carr, s Receiving Antenna Handbook.

Google Scholar

[9] S. Yi, Y. Pei, and S. Kalyanaraman, On the capacity improvement of ad hoc wireless networks using directional antennas, in Proceedings of the 4th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking &computing. ACM, 2003, p.108–116.

DOI: 10.1145/778415.778429

Google Scholar

[10] T. ElBatt, T. Anderson, and B. Ryu, Performance evaluation of multiple access protocols for ad hoc networks using directional antennas, in Wireless Communications and Networking, 2003. WCNC 2003. 2003 IEEE, vol. 2. IEEE, 2003, p.982–987.

DOI: 10.1109/wcnc.2003.1200505

Google Scholar

[11] T. Rappaport et al., Wireless communications: principles and practice. Prentice Hall PTR New Jersey, 1996, vol. 207.

Google Scholar