Biological Effects of Color Lighting for Different Ages

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effects of lighting have extended to non-visual biological field since the intrinsic photosensitive retinal ganglion cell (ipRGC) was discovered at the beginning of 21st century. More relationships between lighting and health issues have been found since then. In this study, heart rate changes of both the young adults (about 25 years old) and the old adults (about 65 years old) who were exposed to dim lighting with different color (440nm, 460nm, 490nm and 510nm) were recorded. Significant statistical differences were found in the group of young adults, but no difference was found in the group of old adults. The analysis shows that the total light power entered into the eye is more reasonable to evaluate the non-visual effect of heart rate change. As one of the important non-visual effects of lighting is to synchronize the circadian rhythm, the results suggest that even dim color light can show biological effects on the young adults and the elderly may need more light to have the identical effects.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

787-791

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Berman, S.M., Clear, R. D, 2008a. Past vision studies can support a novel human photoreceptor. Light & Engineering. 16(2): 88-94.

Google Scholar

[2] Berman, S.M., 2008b. A new retinal photoreceptor should affect lighting practice. Lighting Res. Technol. 40: 373-376.

DOI: 10.1177/1477153508097975

Google Scholar

[3] Berson, D.M., et al. 2002. Phototransduction by retinal ganglion cells that set the circadian clock. Science 295, 1070-1073.

DOI: 10.1126/science.1067262

Google Scholar

[4] Brainard, G.C., et al. 2001. Action spectrum for melatonin regulations in humans: evidence for a novel circadian photoreceptor. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21(16): 6405–6412.

DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.21-16-06405.2001

Google Scholar

[5] Brainard, G.C., Provencio Ignacio, 2006. Photoreception for the neurobehavioral effects of light in humans. 2nd CIE Expert Symposium on Lighting and Health, 6-21.

Google Scholar

[6] Briaud, S.A., et al. 2004. Continuous light exposure and sympathectomy suppress circadian rhythm of blood pressure in rats. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics 9(2): 97-105.

DOI: 10.1177/107424840400900205

Google Scholar

[7] Cajochen, C., et al. 2005. High sensitivity of human melatonin, alertness, thermoregulation, and heart rate to short wavelength light. The journal of clinical endocrinology & metabolism 90(3): 1311-1316.

DOI: 10.1210/jc.2004-0957

Google Scholar

[8] Gamlin, P.D., et al. 2007. Human and macaque pupil responses driven by melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells. Vision research, 47(7): 946-954.

DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.12.015

Google Scholar

[9] Keiko, I, et al. 2001. Age-related decline in color perception and difficulties with daily activities–measurement, questionnaire, optical and computer-graphics simulation studies. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 28: 153-163.

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-8141(01)00028-2

Google Scholar

[10] P L Turner and M A Mainster. 2008. Circadian photoreception: ageing and the eye's important role in systemic health. Br J Ophthalmol 92: 1439-1444.

DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2008.141747

Google Scholar

[11] Morita, T., Tokura, H., 1998. The influence of different wavelengths of light on human biological rhythms. Applied human science, 17(3): 91-96.

DOI: 10.2114/jpa.17.91

Google Scholar

[12] Yasukouchi, A., et al. 2005. Non-visual effects of the color temperature of fluorescent lamps on physiological aspects in humans. Journal of physiological anthropology and applied human science, 24(1): 41-43.

DOI: 10.2114/jpa.24.41

Google Scholar

[13] Zeitzer, J.M., et al. 2000. Sensitivity of the human circadian pacemaker to nocturnal light: melatonin phase resetting and suppression. Journal of physiology, 526(3): 695-702.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00695.x

Google Scholar

[14] Wright KP Jr., et al. 2001. Intrinsic near 24-h pacemaker period determines limits of circadian entrainment to a weak synchronizer in humans. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences USA, 98(24): 14027-32.

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.201530198

Google Scholar