Study on the Interlaboratory Comparison Test of the Electronic Test Method for Raw Silk

Abstract:

To establish an international standard on the electronic testing method for raw silk, the interlaboratory comparison tests of the electronic testing method for raw silk are done. Five lots of soaked silk are sampled and tested by four machines of the same type in four labs, 13 items including the defects and evenness information of each lot of silk are measured. The analysis of variance and multiple comparison procedure are used to find whether there exist significant differences among the four machines; and the result shows that there are no significant differences among the machines in testing these items except for the item of IPMe by optical sensor. The reason for the difference is analyzed, and the measure for dismissing the difference is proposed.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 241-244)
• Pages: 317-321
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.241-244.317
• Online since: December 2012
• Authors: Jian Mei Xu, Ying Zhou, Suo Zhuai Dong, Francesco Gatti, Dong Ping Wu, Xin Er Bian, Zhi Min Zhao
• Keywords: Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Defect, Electronic Test for Raw Silk, Evenness

References

[1] Zhou Ying. Research and expectation of the electronic testing technique for raw silk. Silk Monthly. 2009, (9): 42-51.(In Chinese)

[2] Xu Jianmei, Bai Lun. Distribution for the coefficient of variation in the electronic testing for raw silk size. Proceedings of the fiber society 2009 spring conference. 2009: 578-581.

[3] R. Chattopadhyay, S.Das, M. L. Gulrajani et al.. A comparison between the quality attributes of silk yarn using the uster and seriplane test systems. J.Text.Inst.1997,88: 92-98.

DOI: 10.1080/00405009708658533

[4] W. Zhang, C. Iype, and W. Qxenham. The analysis of yarn thin places and unevenness with an image-analysis system and program design, J. Text. Inst., 1998,89(1): 44-58.

DOI: 10.1080/00405009808658596

[5] I. Porat, K. Greenwood, and S. Saharkhiz. Problems and perspectives of continuous yarn testing, J. Text. Inst., 2000, 91(3): 117-132.

DOI: 10.1080/00405000008659545

[6] Jay L.Devore. Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences, Duxbury Press 6th ed., 2004: 410-427.

[7] John A.Rice, Mathematical statistics and data analysis, Duxbury Press, 2nd ed.,1994: 451-452.

[8] ISO 5725-2:1994, Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results, Part 2: Basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method.

DOI: 10.3403/30329301