Integral Sliding-Mode Control with Applications to Aircraft Dynamics

Article Preview

Abstract:

A Continuous Sliding-Mode Controller (CSMC) using integral action is implemented to control the response of the longitudinal dynamics of an aircraft. Model-following of the pitch rate q is obtained through this method. Asymptotic regulation achieved by integral control has its downsides because transient performance is reduced. A solution to this problem consists in using the integral action only “conditionally”, thus eliminating the performance downgrade. Finally a comparison will show how Sliding-mode control will minimize the chattering phenomenon and also reduce “integrator windup” problem, thus minimizing the loss of transient performance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

340-345

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Sridhar Seshagiri, Hassan K. Khalil "Robust output feedback regulation of minimum-phase nonlinear systems", Automatica 41 (2005) 43 – 54.

DOI: 10.1016/s0005-1098(04)00248-1

Google Scholar

[2] Jean-Jacques E. Slotine and Weiping Li. Applied Nonlinear Control. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1991.

Google Scholar

[3] Khalil, H. K. (2000). Universal integral controllers for minimum phase nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 45(3), 490–494.

DOI: 10.1109/9.847730

Google Scholar

[4] U.I. Utkin, Sliging Mode in Control and Optimization, Springer-Verlag, 1992.

Google Scholar

[5] E.M. Jafarov and R. Tasaltin. Robust sliding-mode control for the uncertain MIMO aircraft model F-18. IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electronic Sys., 36(4):1127–1141, 2000.

DOI: 10.1109/7.892663

Google Scholar

[7] H. K. Khalil, Nonlinear Systems, Prentice Hall.

Google Scholar

[8] J. A. Burton and A.S. Zinober, "Continuous approximation of variable structure control," International Journal of Systems Science, Vol. 17, No.6, pp.875-885, 1986.2002.

DOI: 10.1080/00207728608926853

Google Scholar

[9] B. Lu. Linear Parameter-Varying Control of an F-16 Aircraft at High Angle of Attack. PhD thesis, North Carolina State University, 2004.

Google Scholar

[10] J.M. Biannic and P. Apkarian. Parameter varying control of a high performance aircraft. In Proc. AIAA, Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, pages 69–87, 1996.

DOI: 10.2514/6.1996-3807

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Huo, M. Mirmirani, P. Ioannou, and R. Colgren. Adaptive linear quadratic design with application to F-16 fighter aircraft. In AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, August 2004.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2004-5421

Google Scholar

[12] B. Stevens and F. Lewis. Aircraft Control and Simulation. John Wiley and Sons, 1992.

Google Scholar

[13] R. Rysdyk and A.J. Calise. Robust nonlinear adaptive flight control for consistent handling qualities. IEEE Trans. Aut. Ctrl., 13(6):896–910, 2005.

DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2005.854345

Google Scholar

[14] T. Lee and Y. Kim. Nonlinear adaptive flight control using backstepping and neural networks controller. Jnl. Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 24(4):675–682, 2001.

DOI: 10.2514/2.4794

Google Scholar

[15] Y.J. Huang, T.C. Kuo, and H.K. Way. Robust vertical takeoff and landing aircraft control via integral sliding mode. Control Theory and Applications, IEE Proceedings-, 150:383–388, 2003.

DOI: 10.1049/ip-cta:20030593

Google Scholar