The Effect of Nozzle Breakaway Pressure on the Spray Pattern Formed

Article Preview

Abstract:

The main function of a fuel injector nozzle is to break fuels into droplets, form the spray pattern, and propel the droplets into a combustion chamber. The amount of spray volume at a given operating pressure, the travel speed, and spacing between the jets of fuel can also be determined by the nozzle. In fuel injection, the smallest possible droplet size is desired for the most flow. This work presents an opportunity to use the Schlieren arrangement as a visualization method to view the flow of fuel from a three-hole fuel injector nozzle which cannot be seen by the naked eye. The jet flow of diesel Fuel was investigated by Schlieren photography. A test rig was designed and constructed to accommodate the nozzle; optical mirrors were arranged according to Schlieren specifications in order to allow the jet to be photographed. The breakaway pressure of the nozzle was varied between 60bar to 80bar. Each hole of the nozzle is 0.26mm in diameter and 120° apart; the third jet could not be seen from the images because the camera took x-y dimension images. The spray pattern observed from the two dimensional images of the jets developed were seen to be well dispersed. Su et al [3] found that emissions could be reduced in diesel engines if the injector nozzle produces smaller and more dispersed droplets.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

173-178

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] G. S. Settles, Schlieren and Shadowgraph Techniques: Visualising phenomena in transparent media. (2001).

Google Scholar

[2] W. P. Campbell, Extension agricultural systems specialist www. ianrpubs. unl. edu/farmpower/g955. htm.

Google Scholar

[3] T.F. Su, P.V. Farrell, and R.T. Nagarajan, Nozzle effects on high pressure diesel Injection, SAE paper No. 950083, (1995).

DOI: 10.4271/950083

Google Scholar

[4] C. Soteriou, R. Andrews, and M. Smith, Direct injection diesel sprays and the effect of cavitation and hydraulic flip on atomisation, SAE paper No. 950080, (1995).

DOI: 10.4271/950080

Google Scholar

[5] Komoda, Tatsuya, Kawase and Hajime, Effect of fuel injection system improvement on white smoke reduction in small diesel engines with swirl chamber.

Google Scholar

[6] J. C. Huh, G.Y. Lee, O. Y. Yang, Experimental study on initial behaviour of diesel fuel spray characteristics.

Google Scholar

[7] Nakahira, Toshio, Komori, and Masanori, Shock wave generation around the diesel fuel spray with high pressure injection.

DOI: 10.4271/920460

Google Scholar

[8] Wang, and Peilin, New method of spray angle adjustment for pressure atomising fuel injector with a Laval nozzle.

Google Scholar

[9] A. J. Yule, M. R. Mirza, and Filipovic, Correlations for diesel spray penetration including the effects of the break-up zone.

Google Scholar

[10] Zizelman, James, Seino, J. Michael, Graves, C. Michael, and J. C. Manz, central port fuel injection.

Google Scholar

[11] J. L. Chen, G. Chen, M. Wells, J. Creehan, Flows, sprays and primary atomisation of gasoline injectors.

Google Scholar

[12] Guo, Long-De, Zhou, Zhao-Fei, Zhang, Long, The research for the computer simulation technique for flow visualisation.

Google Scholar

[13] M. R. Wilson, and R. J. Hiemenz, Light source for high speed photography.

Google Scholar

[14] D. W. Holder, and R. J North, A Schlieren Apparatus Giving an image in colour.

Google Scholar

[15] W. L. Dana, Measurements of fuel distribution within sprays for fuel injection engines.

Google Scholar

[16] M. S. Kaczor, A comparative study of the combustion and emissions of a compression ignition engine fuelled on diesel and Di-methyl-ether.

Google Scholar

[17] S. C. Sorenson, and S. Mikkelsen, Performance and emissions of a 0. 273 litre direct injection diesel engine fuelled with neat Di-methyl-ether, SAE International Congress and explosion, Detroit, Michigan. (1995).

DOI: 10.4271/950064

Google Scholar

[18] T. Fleisch, World conference on refinery and processing and reformulating fuels, San Antonio, Texas. (1996).

Google Scholar

[19] J. M. Desantes, J. Benajes, S. Molina, and C. A. Gonzalez, The modification of the fuel injection rate in heavy-duty diesel engines: Its effects on engine performance and emissions.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2004.05.003

Google Scholar

[20] M. Milan, A new method for measuring fuel-injection rate, University of Maribor, Slovenia. (1998).

Google Scholar

[21] N. Bignell, The use of small sonic nozzles as secondary flow standards. (1999).

Google Scholar

[22] ISO 9300, Measurement of gas flows by means of critical flow venturi nozzles. (1990).

Google Scholar

[23] N. Bignell, Thermal effects in small sonic nozzles. (2001).

Google Scholar