Study on Wavelet Denoising of Pulse Impact Force of Non-Viscosity Debris Flow

Article Preview

Abstract:

Noise filtering of impact load spectrum is the key to ensure the impact load of debris flow during the control engineering design of debris flow. As the laboratory impacting test indicates, noise effect in pulse impact force spectrum can be denoised using Daubechie(dbN)and Symlet(symN)wavelet methods, both of which contain hard threshold method and soft threshold method. Analyzed the pulse impact force of non-viscosity debris flow testing results by wavelet denoising method, the testing conditions are A-3(whose grain size is range from 0.3cm to 0.8cm), B-3(whose grain size is range from 0.8cm to 1.5cm) and C-3(whose grain size is range from 1.5cm to 3.0cm),all of whose solid phase ratio are 0.16.The analyzing results show that the denosing effect adopting Db5 wavelet function is superior to ones adopting Sym2 wavelet function, meanwhile, the denosing effect adopting hard threshold method is superior to ones adopting soft threshold method. The results also indicate that the bigger the solid phase ratio is, the bigger the Signal Noise Ratio is, the better the wavelet denosing effect is. These results could provide scientific basis for further accurate experimental study to ensure impact load of non-viscosity debris flow.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1040-1046

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. A. Bagnold. Proc., Royal Soc. of London, 225. A(1954).

Google Scholar

[2] S. B. Savage. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 92. 1 (1979).

Google Scholar

[3] Wei H. China Railway Science, 17. 3 (1996).

Google Scholar

[4] R. Valentino, G. Barla, and L. Montrasio. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 41. 1 (2008).

Google Scholar

[5] Chen H. K, Tang H. M. China Journal of Highway and Transport. 19. 3 (2006).

Google Scholar

[6] Wu J. S. Science Press, Beijing(1990).

Google Scholar

[7] M. D. Ortigueira, C. J. C. Matos, and M. S. Piedade. Nonlinear Dynamics. 29 (2002).

Google Scholar

[8] F. Ahmed and N. Kishi. Optical Review, 1. 1 (2003).

Google Scholar

[9] Chen H. K. , Tang H. M. , Xian X. F. , et al. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 29. 8 (2010).

Google Scholar

[10] Chen H. K. , Tang H. M. , Zhang Y. P. , and He X. Y. 2011 AASRI Conference on Applied Information Technology, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, 3 (2011).

Google Scholar

[11] Sun Y. L, Liu D. M. Journal of Wuhan University of Hydraulic and Electric Engineering , 36. 2 (2003).

Google Scholar

[12] Zou K. , Yuan J. Q, Gong X. B. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing (2002).

Google Scholar

[13] Chen H. K., Tang H. M. , Xian X. F. Journal of Chongqing University. 33. 5 (2010).

Google Scholar

[14] Qian N. , Wan Z. H. Science Press, Beijing (2003).

Google Scholar

[15] R. M. Iverson, and R. P. Denlinger. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106. B1 (2001).

Google Scholar

[16] P. Brufau, P. Garcia-Navarro, P. Ghilardi, L. Natale, and P. Savi. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 38. 6 (2000).

DOI: 10.1080/00221680009498297

Google Scholar

[17] Chen H. K., Tang H. M., and Chen Y. Y. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics. 27. 3 (2006).

Google Scholar