Finite Element Resistivity Forward Modeling Using Algebraic Multigrid Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

An algebraic multigrid by smoothed aggregation preconditioned conjugate gradient method is developed to solve the liner system arising from 3-D direct current finite element resistivity forward modeling. The algorithm combines the efficiency of algebraic multigrid method and the stability of conjugate gradient method. Algebraic multigrid by smoothed aggregation keep in high-efficiency while simulation using local quasi-uniform mesh and its convergence effect will reduce while numerical modeling using anisotropic stretched grids. However tensor product non-equidistant mesh, a kind of anisotropic stretched grids, is often used in 3-D direct current resistivity forward modeling. In order to improve this situation, a factor is added to guide correct aggregation. Consequently, a typical example is used to prove that the improvement is the right. Finally, it is natural to conclude that the algorithm suggested in this paper is efficient and robust whether simulation using local quasi-uniform mesh or tensor product non-equidistant mesh

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

792-797

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] X. Wu,G. Xu, S. Li, The Caculation of Three-dimensional Geoeletric Field of Point Source by incomplete Cholesky conjugate gradient, Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 41(1998) 848-854.

Google Scholar

[2] X. Wu, G. Xu, S. Li, A 3-D Finite Element Resistivity Forward Modeling Using Conjugate Gradient Algorithm, Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 46(2003) 428-432.

DOI: 10.1002/cjg2.3379

Google Scholar

[3] J. LU, X. Wu, K. Spitzer, Algebraic Multigrid Method for 3D dc Resistivity modeling, Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 53(2010) 700-707.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Tang, F. Wang, Y. Ren, 3-D direct current resistivity forward modeling by adaptive multigrid finite element method, Journal of Central South University of Technology, 17(2010) 587-592.

DOI: 10.1007/s11771-010-0527-z

Google Scholar

[5] W.L. Briggs, S.F. McCormick, A multigrid tutorial, second ed., Tsinghua Press, Beijing, (2000).

Google Scholar

[6] A. Dey, H.F. Morrison, Resistivity modeling for arbitrarily shaped three-dimensional structures, Geophysics, 44(1979a) 753-780.

DOI: 10.1190/1.1440975

Google Scholar

[7] S. Xu, The finite element method in geophysics, People's Education Press, Beijing, (1995).

Google Scholar

[8] S.K. Zhao, M.J. Yedlin, Some refinements on the finite-difference method for 3-D dc resistivity modeling, Geophysics, 61(1996) 1301-1307.

DOI: 10.1190/1.1444053

Google Scholar

[9] T. Mifune, T. Iwashita, and M. Shimasaki, New Algebraic Multigrid Preconditioning for Iterative Solvers in Electromagnetic Finite Edge-Element Analyses, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 39(2003)1677-1680.

DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2003.810350

Google Scholar

[10] P. Vanek, J. Mandel, M. Brezina, Algebraic multigrid based on smoothed aggregation for second and fourth order problems. Computing 56(1996) 179–196.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02238511

Google Scholar

[11] M. W. Gee, J.J. Hu, R.S. Tuminaro, A new smoothed aggregation multigrid method for anisotropic problems, Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications, 16(2009) 19–37.

DOI: 10.1002/nla.593

Google Scholar