The Efficiency of Natural and Electrokinetic Enhanced Migration of Pb in Aquifer

Article Preview

Abstract:

The natural and electrokinetic enhanced migration method was studied by the experiments in groundwater contaminated by heavy metal Pb in this work. The experimental results showed that the variation rule of Pb reflected that its migration was weak and the removal efficiency was only 9.30% near the anode in the natural seepage condition, but under the enhanced migration and remediation function, the pollutants could be enriched and removed faster, thus the removal efficiency of Pb was 46.72% near the anode at the end of experiment when the experimental voltage gradient was 0.28V/cm, which made known that this electrokinetic enhanced migration of Pb in contaminated groundwater was more effective method than that of natural seepage migration and enhanced the removal of contaminant in aquifer.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1098-1101

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Zhang Xihui, Wang Hui: Advances in Water Science, vol.12(2001), pp.249-255 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Long Xingxian:Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, vol.13(2002), pp.757-762 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Zhou Jiaxiang:Techniques for Pollution Control,vol.1(2000), pp.52-56 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Shen Zhenguo, Chen Manhuai: Rural Eco-Environment, vol.16(2000),pp.39-44 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] Kim S O, Moon S H, Kim K W: Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 125(2001):259-272.

Google Scholar

[6] Genc A, Chase G, Foos A:Water Air and Soil Pollution, 2009, 197(2009): 131-141.

DOI: 10.1007/s11270-008-9796-7

Google Scholar

[7] Gidarakos E, Giannis A:Water Air and Soil Pollution,172(2006): 295-312.

Google Scholar

[8] Zhou Dongmei, Cang Long:China Environmental Science,vol.25(2005),pp.10-14 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] Cang Long, Zhou Dongmei:Acta Pedologica Sinica, vol.42(2005), pp.999-1005 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] Wang Yehui, Meng Fansheng:Ecology and Environment, vol. 14(2005),pp.855-859 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[11] Meng Fansheng:Environmental Science & Technology, vol.28(2005), pp.27-30 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] Lu Xiaocheng,Huang Xingfa:Sciencepaper Online, vol. 2(2007), pp.577-581 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[13] Ding Sa, Luo Yatian:Wuyi Science Journal,vol.23(2007), pp.53-57 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[14] Meng Fansheng, Wang Yehui:Ground water, vol. 34(2007), pp.96-99 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[15] Yang Xuemei:Technological development of enterprise, vol.11(2009),pp.9-10 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[16] David W B, Carol J P, Shawn G B, et al.Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 45(2000): 123-137

Google Scholar

[17] Ralph D L, Rick G M, David W B, et al.Ground Water, 40(2002) (1): 59-66

Google Scholar

[18] Bostick W D, Shoemaker J L: Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,3(1994) (15): 207-211

Google Scholar

[19] Powell R M, Puls R W, Hightower S K, et al. Environ. Sci. Tech, 29(1995) (8): 1913-1922

Google Scholar

[20] Westerhoff P: Journal of Environ. Eng, 2003, 129(2003) (1): 10-16

Google Scholar

[21] Robertson W D, Cherry J A: Ground Water, 1995, 33(1995) (1): 99-111

Google Scholar

[22] Baker M J, Blowes D W, Ptacek C J: Environ. Sci. Tech, 1998, 32(1998) (8): 2308-2316

Google Scholar

[23] Hu Hongtao:Journal of Agro-Environment Science, vol.25(2006), pp.661-664 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar