Methodological Approach for Evaluation of Roundabout Performances through Microsimulation

Abstract:

In the literature, there are many methodologies that allow the evaluation of roundabout performances (Capacity, Levels Of Service, etc.): analytical models (HCM, HBS etc.), statistical models (TRRL, SETRA) etc. Each technique considers some aspects of the roundabout in comparison to others (geometric elements, vehicular flow and behavioral parameters). Obtained results are often not comparable among themselves because of distinctive peculiarities of each method. Today, the best way to solve this problem is by using a refined simulation software of vehicular circulation. However, along with a more and more refined analysis of microsimulation software algorithms, it is frequently necessary for each user (researcher, engineer, planner, etc.) to know the real sensitivity of these packages with regard to the most important key parameters. In this paper the Authors introduce the results of a wide survey conducted on an ample range of virtual roundabout scenarios by the use of a modern simulation software. Each scenario describes a fixed roundabout phenomenon using the following variables: geometric elements (inscribed circle radius, circulatory roadway, central and splitter islands etc.); characteristics of the traffic flow (dynamic traffic assignment, approach speed, circulatory speed and reduced speed zones, etc.); behavioral features (priority rules, minimum gap, minimum headway, etc.). The results are presented from the evaluation of stop-line delays.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 253-255)
• Pages: 1956-1966
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.253-255.1956
• Online since: December 2012
• Authors: Rosolino Vaiana, Vincenzo Gallelli, Teresa Iuele
• Keywords: Capacity, Level of Service, Microsimulation Software, Roundabout, Stop-Line Delay

References

[1] L. Rodegerdts et al.: Roundabouts: An Informational Guide. Second Edition. NCHRP Report 672. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. (2010).

[2] HCM. Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. (2010).

[3] F. G. Praticò, R. Vaiana and V. Gallelli: Transport and traffic management by micro simulation models: operational use and performance of roundabouts. Presented at Urban Transport 2012, A Coruña, Spain (2012).

DOI: 10.2495/ut120331

[4] C. Kinzel and M. Trueblood: The Effects of Operational Parameters in the Simulation of Roundabouts. Kansas City, Missouri (2004) (information on http: /www. kutc. ku. edu).

[5] R. Akcelik: Roundabouts. Comments on aaSIDRA and TRL (UK) linear regression model. Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd, Sydney (2004).

[6] Rodel 1: interactive roundabout design. Rodel Software Ltd and Staffordshire County Council, U.K. (2002).

[7] A. Mohamed and Yasser H.: State-of-the-art report on: Roundabouts design, modeling and simulation. University of Central Florida, Orlando (2001).

[8] B. Guichet: Roundabouts in France. Portland (1997).

[9] D. Stanek and R. Milam: High-capacity roundabout intersection analysis: going around in circles. Proceedings of the National Roundabout Conference 2005, Vail, USA (2005).

[10] V. Kiattikomol and T. Urbanik II: An Evaluation of Roundabout as an Alternative Intersection Control Device using VISSIM Simulation application. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. (2005).

[11] M. Trueblood and J. Dale: Simulating roundabouts with Vissim. Kansas City, Missouri, USA (2004) (information on http: /www. kutc. ku. edu).

[12] VISSIM Manual User - Release 4. 10. PTV Planung Transport Verkehr, Karlsruhe, Germany (2005).

[13] G. Guido, F. F. Saccomanno, A. Vitale and F. Cunto: Comparing Safety at Signalized Intersections and Roundabouts Using Simulated Rear-End Conflicts - Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2078(2008).

DOI: 10.3141/2078-12

[14] G. Guido, V. Astarita, V. Giofrè and A. Vitale: Safety performance measures: a comparison between microsimulation and observational data – Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 20 (2011), p.217–225.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.027

[15] R. Vaiana, V. Gallelli and G.F. Capiluppi: Roundabout intersections: analysis for scenarios by micro-simulation, Proceedings of 4th International SIIV Congress - Advances in transport infrastructures and stakeholder expectations, Management Session, Palermo, Italy (2007).

[16] R. Vaiana and V. Gallelli: Roundabout intersections: evaluation of geometric and behavioural features with Vissim, TRB - National Roundabout Conference, Kansas City - Missouri USA (2008).

[17] R. Vaiana, V. Gallelli and T. Iuele: Simulation of Observed Traffic Conditions on Roundabouts by Dedicated Software – SIIV, 5th International Congress, Sustainability of Road Infrastructures Procedia, Social and Behavioral Science, (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.924

[18] G. Loah: Capacite des carrefours giratoires interurbains. Documentation Technique 44. Ministere de l'Equipement du Logement, de l'Amenagement du Territoire et des Transports, Paris (1987).

[19] R. Vaiana and V. Gallelli: The calibration of traffic microscopic simulation models: kinematical approach to the through movement on roundabouts, Presented at TRB 90st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., USA (2011).

[20] R. Vaiana, V. Gallelli and T. Iuele: Analysis of roundabout stop-line delays: effects of kinematical and behavioural parameters in the simulation process of observed traffic conditions. Presented at TRB 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., USA (2012).