A Comparison of Two Magnitude Estimation Methods Using Predominant Period in Earthquake Early Warning

Article Preview

Abstract:

Currently, there are two magnitude estimation approaches using predominant period for earthquake early warning, Tpmax method and Tc method. We compared Tpmax method with Tc method from the NSMP strong motion records of 22 earthquakes in United States with moment magnitude ranging from 4.1 to 7.9, to explore which method was with higher precision and could be suitable for the earthquake early warning system. Our results show that scaling relations between the two predominant period parameters, Tpmax and Tc, calculated from P-wave arrivals and earthquake magnitude are consistent with previous research. It was found that Tc method had higher precision than Tpmax method with the same filter band, and had best result in magnitude estimation resulting in a correlation coefficient of 0.78 and a standard deviation of 0.16 using 3 seconds signal after the P-wave arrival. We also found that Tc method without low-pass filter had higher accuracy than Tpmax method without low-pass filter. We recommended Tc method using 3 seconds signal after the P-wave arrival as the priority magnitude estimation method for earthquake early warning.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2193-2199

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. M. Espinosa-Aranda, A. Jimenez, G. Ibarrola, et al: Seismological Research Letters, 66 (1995), pp.42-52.

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Nakamura: Proceedings of 9th WCEE, Vol. VII (1988), pp.673-678.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Hoshiba, O. Kamigaichi, M. Saito, et al: EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 89(8) (2008), pp.73-80.

DOI: 10.1029/2008eo080001

Google Scholar

[4] O. Kamigaichi, M. Saito, K. Doi, et al: Seismological Research Letters, 80(5) (2009), pp.717-726.

Google Scholar

[5] Y. M. Wu, T. C. Shin, C. C. Chen, et al: Seismological Research Letters, 68(6) (1997), pp.931-943.

Google Scholar

[6] Y. M. Wu, T. L. Teng: Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, 92(5) (2002), p.2008-(2018).

Google Scholar

[7] N. C. Hsiao, Y. M. Wu, T. C. Shin, et al: Geophysical Research Letters, 36 (2009), L00B02.

Google Scholar

[8] F. Wenzel, M. C. Oncescu, M. Baur, et al: Seismological Research Letters, 70(2) (1999), pp.161-169.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Böse, C. Ionescu, F. Wenzel: Seismological Research Letters, 34 (2007), L07302.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Erdik, Y. Fahjan, O. Ozel, et al: Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 1 (2003), pp.157-163.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1024813612271

Google Scholar

[11] H. Alcik, O. Ozel, N. Apaydin, et al: Geophysical Research Letters. 36 (2009), L00B05.

Google Scholar

[12] K. Fleming, M. Picozzi, C. Milkereit, et al: Seismological Research Letters, 80(5) 2009, pp.755-771.

Google Scholar

[13] R. M. Allen, H. Kanamori: Science, 300 (2003), pp.786-789.

Google Scholar

[14] G. Wurman, R. M. Allen, P. Lombard: Journal of Geophysical Research, 112 (2007), B08311.

Google Scholar

[15] G. Cua, M. Fischer, T. Heaton, et al: Seismological Research Letters, 80(5) (2009), pp.740-747.

Google Scholar

[16] E. Weber, V. Convertito, G. Iannaccone, et al: Seismological Research Letters. 78(6) (2007), pp.622-634.

Google Scholar

[17] A. Zollo, G. Iannaccone, M. Lancieri, et al: Geophysical Research Letters, 36 (2009), L00B07.

Google Scholar

[18] H. S. Peng, Z. L. Wu, Y. M. Wu, et al: Seismological Research Letters, 82(3) (2011), 394-403.

Google Scholar

[19] Q. Ma: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, 2008 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[20] H. Kanamori: Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 33 (2005), p.195–214.

Google Scholar

[21] E. L. Olson, R. M. Allen: Nature, 438 (2005), pp.212-215.

Google Scholar

[22] Rydelek P, Horiuchi S: Nature, 2006, 442: E5-E6.

Google Scholar

[23] Y. M. Wu, H. Kanamori: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95 (2005), pp.347-353.

Google Scholar

[24] Y. M. Wu, H. Kanamori: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95 (2005), pp.1181-1185.

Google Scholar

[25] A. B. Lockman, R. M. Allen: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97(1B) (2007), pp.140-150.

Google Scholar

[26] M. A. Lewis, Y. Ben-Zion: Geophysical Journal International, 170 (2007), pp.1258-1268.

Google Scholar

[27] M. Olivieri, J. Schweitzer: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97(5) (2007), pp.1750-1755.

Google Scholar

[28] Y. Xu, Z. L. Wu, C. S. Jiang, et al: Acta Seismologica Sinica, 21(2) (2008), pp.139-147.

Google Scholar

[29] M. A. Lewis, Y. Ben-Zion: Journal of Geophysical Research, 113 (2008), B09305.

Google Scholar

[30] W. T. Wang, S. D. Ni, Y. Chen, et al: Geophysical Research Letters, 36 (2009), L16305.

Google Scholar

[31] V. Sokolov, F. Wenzel, T. Furumura: Earth Planets Space, 61 (2009), pp.1275-1285.

Google Scholar

[32] Y. Park, S. C. Park, K. H. Kim, et al: Jouarnal of Seismology, 14(4) (2010), pp.761-768.

Google Scholar

[33] R. V. Allen: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 68 (1978), pp.1521-1532.

Google Scholar

[34] H. Akaike: Second International Symposium on Information Theory, 1973, pp.267-281.

Google Scholar