Research of Reinforce Plan for No. Zero Frame of TB200 Aircraft and Secondary Damage Prediction

Article Preview

Abstract:

The original structure stress state of No. zero frame of TB200 aircraft is analyzed by finite element method. The stress and the reasons of the crack on the frame are determined. The numerical analysis results fit well with the actual damage of the frame, and the finite element analysis model is verified to be reliable. The stress state of the damaged frame structure is analyzed, which shows that the undamaged frame structure must be reinforced. The reinforce plan for the undamaged frame structure is given. The reinforced frame structure is analyzed by finite element method. The stress state and the residual strength of the reinforced frame structure are given. It is showed that the reinforce plan causes an obvious descent of the frame stress. The load is mainly distributed on the reinforcement of the No. zero frame. The residual static strength of the reinforced structure is higher than the original structure. The possible secondary damage position and mode of the reinforced structure are predicted.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

303-309

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Baker AA. Fatigue studies related to the certification of composite crack patching for primary metallic aircraft structure[C]. In: Presented at FAA-NASA symposium on continued airworthness of aircraft structures. Atlanta: 28-30 August (1996).

Google Scholar

[2] Turaga V.R. S Umamaheswar, Ripudaman Singh. Modelling of a patch repair to a thin cracked sheet[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1999, 62: 267~289.

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(98)00088-5

Google Scholar

[3] R. Kaye, M. Heller. Finite element-based three-dimensional stress analysis of composite bonded repairs to metallic aircraft structure[J]. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, 2006, 26: 261~273.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.03.016

Google Scholar

[4] H. Fekirini, B. Bachir Bouiadjra, M. Belhouari, et al. Numerical analysis of the performances of bonded composite repair with two adhesive bands in aircraft structures[J]. COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2007, 10: 1016~1022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.12.004

Google Scholar

[5] LI Zhong, LIU YaLong, WANG ShengNan, et al. Residual strength analysis of stiffened panels with widespread fatigue damage[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2004, 4: 29~35.

Google Scholar

[6] Wang Zhizhi, Chen Li, Nie Xuezhou. The application of residual strength criterion for widespread cracks on aircraft. Research of Structure and Strength, 2005, 2: 1~4.

Google Scholar

[7] Hou Rili, Zhang Jianhua, Zhou Ping, et al. Residual strength analysis of aircraft LY12 structure impacted by projectile. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2005, 5: 91~92.

Google Scholar

[8] T.Y. YANG. Finite Element Structural Analysis[M]. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall Inc., (1986).

Google Scholar