The Economic Comparisons and Introduction to China of the Kyoto Mechanisms

Su Feng Wang; Yu Bai

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.260-261.642

Paper Titles

Study on the Kitchen Residues and Cattle Manure Anaerobic Co-Digestion in Bench-Scale Laboratory Test
p.621

Utilization of Steelmaking and Hot-Rolling Mill Waste
p.627

Health Risk Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the Pearl River Delta
p.631

Research on Application Mechanism of Vanadium Extraction Tailings by Cleaner Production
p.637

The Economic Comparisons and Introduction to China of the Kyoto Mechanisms
p.642

Environmental Pollution and Protection of Oil & Gas Production and Utilization in China
p.648

Heavy Metal Element Sedimentary Record Adjacent to the Pingtan Island
p.654

The Water Pollution Control Planning Research in Lingyuan Stream Segment of Daling River
p.659

Development and Sensitivity Analysis of Model for Aeration Chamber in Water-Circulating Aerator
p.663

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 260-261The Economic Comparisons and Introduction to China...

The Economic Comparisons and Introduction to China of the Kyoto Mechanisms

Abstract:

The Kyoto mechanisms are important cost-effective ways of CO2 reduction for Annex I countries in the Kyoto Protocol. This paper makes a comparison among international emission trading (IET), joint implementation (JI) and clean development mechanism (CDM) on development potentials and economic efficiencies; builds a state-space decision model for the government to encourage enterprises to invest more in project-based mitigation; then presents the pareto optimality conditions. Some conclusions and suggestions for the introduction to China of Kyoto mechanisms are provided finally.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 260-261)

Pages:

642-647

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.260-261.642

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

December 2012

Authors:

Su Feng Wang, Yu Bai

Keywords:

Carbon Abatement, Economic Comparison, Incentive Model, Kyoto Mechanisms

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] R. Richels, J. Edmonds, H. Gruenspecht, T. Wigly. The Berlin Mandate: the Design of Cost-effective Mitigation Strategies. Draft, Energy Modeling Forum-14. Stanford University, Stanford, (1996).

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4953-6_5

Google Scholar

[2] Tietenberg T. Relevant Experience with Tradeable Entitlements. In: Combating Global Warming: Study on a Global System of Tradeable Carbon Emission Entitlements. United Nations, New York, (1992).

Google Scholar

[3] Woerdman E. Implementing the Kyoto Protocol: why JI and CDM Show More Promise than International Emissions Trading. Energy Policy 28(2000) 29-38.

DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4215(99)00094-4

Google Scholar

[4] Zhang J., Wang C. Co-benefits and Additionality of the Clean Development Mechanism: An Emipirical Analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 62 (2011)140-154.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2011.03.003

Google Scholar