Optimizing of Thermal Cycler Control in Microfluidic PCR System

Article Preview

Abstract:

Microfluidic PCR implements the PCR as a continuous process for nucleic acid analytics. Main fields of application are the monitoring of continuous processes for rapid identification of contaminants and quality control as well as high throughput screening of cells or microorganisms. The special heater arrangement allows the implementation of up to 40 cycles on the footprint of a sample. Precise temperature control is the key factor of PCR instrument, and optimal algorithm occupies an important position in this instrument. In order to optimizing the microfluidic PCR system thermal cycler perfomants, fuzzy-PID algorithm was designed, which would replace the lead correction algorithm. The simulation model was constructed and experimented with the use of the Simulink of Matlab software.The simulation results show that overshoot of lead correction algorithm is 8.5%, adjustment time is 3.4s. Overshoot of fuzzy-PID algorithm is 1.45%, adjustment time is only 1.94 s. Obviously, fuzzy-PID algorithm would overcome the defect of large overshoot of traditional PID, and the adjustment time becomes shorter also.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

713-717

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Jun Liu, Weijun Liu, Tianran Wang: The Ninth International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments,2009,pp.3946-3949

Google Scholar

[2] Xueqin Bi, Yuan Ni, Lijuan wang : Computer Engineering and Design, 2008(5),pp.2604-2606,in chinese

Google Scholar

[3] Ning Li,Yuan Ni,Jinlong Sun: Life Science Instruments,2009(5),pp.29-31,in chinese

Google Scholar

[4] Weihua Zhao,Min Zhang,Yan Li,Chong Tang: 2008 International Conference on BioMedical Engineering and Informatics,pp.676-680

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Li, K.H. Ang, G.C.Y. Chong, PID control system analysis and design, IEEE Contr. Syst. Mag. (February) (2006) 32–41.

Google Scholar

[6] Ming Su, Lunjun Chen,Hao lin: journal of Computer Applications.2004(4),pp.51-55,in chinese

Google Scholar

[7] Jinkun Liu. Advanced PID control MATLAB simulation ( Second Edition )[M]. beijing: Publishing House of electronics industry(2007)

Google Scholar

[8] Guoliang Zhang. Fuzzy control and its application in Matlab [M]. Xi'an: Xi'an Jiao Tong University press(2002)

Google Scholar

[9] X.-G. Duan et al. Robustness of fuzzy PID controller due to its inherent saturation[J]. Journal of Process Control 22 (2012): 470– 476

DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2011.12.001

Google Scholar

[10] K.S. Tang, K.F. Man, G.R. Chen, et al., An optimal fuzzy PID controller, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 48 (4) (2001) 757–765.

DOI: 10.1109/41.937407

Google Scholar

[11] H.X. Li, S.K. Tso, quantitative design and analysis of fuzzy PID control – a step towards autotuning, Int. J. Syst. Sci. 31 (5) (2000) 545–553.

DOI: 10.1080/002077200290867

Google Scholar

[12] Moran Wang. Simulink4 modeling and dynamic simulation[M]. beijing: Publishing House of electronics industry(2002)

Google Scholar