Mechanical Shock Ability of Different Potting Materials and Packaging Processes for Electronic Components

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the paper, the mechanical shock abilities of the three potting materials of hard material, silicone and paraffin wax for the ceramic packaging capacitors and metal packaging capacitors are investigated by mechanical shock tests. Results show that the mechanical shock resistance ability of the hard epoxy resin potting material is the strongest, and the mechanical shock resistance ability of the metal packaging component is more than the ceramic packaging. The mechanical shock resistance value of the epoxy resin potting material for metal packaging capacitors is in 20000g above.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

50-54

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] P. Lall, D. Panchagade, C. Prakriti, et al.: Electronic Components and Technology Conference (2005), p.480.

Google Scholar

[2] P. Lall, D. Panchagade, D. Iyengar, et al.: Tenth Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermo mechanical Phenomena in Electronics Systems (2006), p.238.

Google Scholar

[3] D.R. Martinez: Electronic Materials Vol. 4 (1990), p.46.

Google Scholar

[4] C.Y. Zhou, T.X. Yu: International Journal of Impact Engineering Vol. 36 (2009), p.1377.

Google Scholar

[5] Y.S. Chen, Y.C. Huang: Fourth International Microsystems, Packaging, Assembly and Circuits Technology Conference (2009), p.385.

Google Scholar

[6] P. Yang: Fifth International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology (2003), p.275.

Google Scholar

[7] C.S. Chin: Shock and Vibration Vol. 13 (2006), p.607.

Google Scholar

[8] J.H. Gong: Electronics &Packaging Vol. 8 (2008) , p.8.

Google Scholar

[9] J.J. Xu: Journal of Projectiles, Rockets Missiles and Guidance Vol. 31 (2011), p.151.

Google Scholar

[10] N. Sharafkhani, G. Rezazadeh, R. Shabani: Acta Mech Vol. 8 (2012), p.579.

Google Scholar