Comparative Study of Synthetic Jet Numerical Simulation Methods

Shang Qin Tang; Chang Qiang Huang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.275-277.486

Paper Titles

Effects of Unforced Bounday Layer Transition on the Performance of a Two-Dimensional Hypersonic Inlet
p.466

Lattice Boltzmann Simulation of Effect of Rolling Manipulation of Traditional Chinese Massage on Blood Flow
p.472

Ghost Cell Immersed Boundary Method for Simulating Flow over Two Circular Cylinders in Tandem Arrangement
p.478

Numerical Investigation of Vortex Shedding Modes of Flow past Two Circular Cylinders in Side-by-Side Using Immersed Boundary Method
p.482

Comparative Study of Synthetic Jet Numerical Simulation Methods
p.486

Analysis of the Modeling of Single-Phase Flow in a Perforated Pipe with Wall Fluid Influx
p.491

An Easy Calculation Method on Sweep Efficiency of Chemical Flooding
p.496

Numerical Simulation of Underwater Ellipsoid Motion near Free Surface
p.502

A Two-Phase Hydrodynamic Model for Transport Pipelines in Vacuum Sewer Systems
p.508

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 275-277Comparative Study of Synthetic Jet Numerical...

Comparative Study of Synthetic Jet Numerical Simulation Methods

Abstract:

In order to find the best synthetic jet model for active flow control numerical simulation study, exit velocity model, simply connected domain model and moving boundary model were researched through solving the two dimensional transient Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes(RANS) equations under consistent grid and boundary conditions. Velocity and vortex characteristics of flow field were got. Three models were all able to capture the velocity characteristics compared with experiment data. The moving boundary model can capture the distribution of vortices accurately and was the ideal model for applications, because it considered the spatial distribution and time distribution of diaphragm motion, also because it included the volume change rate of actuator cavity.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 275-277)

Pages:

486-490

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.275-277.486

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

January 2013

Authors:

Shang Qin Tang, Chang Qiang Huang

Keywords:

Comparative Study, Numerical Simulation, Synthetic Jet

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] L.D. Kral, J.F. Donovan and A.B. Cain: AIAA Paper, Vol. 4(1997) No. 6, p.1824.

Google Scholar

[2] S.G. Mallinson, J.A. Reizes and G. Hong: AIAA Paper, Vol. 24 (2000) No. 2, p. (1999).

Google Scholar

[3] G.R. He, L. Wang: Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, Vol. 18 (2000) No. 4, p.395 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] C.Y. Lee, D.B. Goldstein: AIAA Journal, Vol. 40 (2002) No. 3, p.510.

Google Scholar

[5] X.B. Luo, Z.X. Li and Z.Y. Guo: Journal of Engineering Thermal Physics, Vol. 22 (2001) No. s, p.56 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] Z.B. Luo. Principle of Synthetic Jet and Dual Synthetic Jets, and their Applications in Jet Vectoring and Micro-pump (Ph.D., National University of Defense Technology, China 2006), p.24 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] X.Y. Ma, Z.Y. Zhang and C.J. Li: Journal of Dynamics and Control, Vol. 5(2007) No. 3, p.278 (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] H. Zohaib, B.F. Alison: Proc. 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting (Nashville, America, January 09-12, 2012). Vol. 1, p.1247.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Zhou,H. Tang and S. Zhong: AIAA Journal, Vol. 47 (2009) No. 5, p.1252.

Google Scholar