Singular Cell Adaptive Method for Adaptively Refined Cartesian Grid in the Simulation of Flow around Airfoil

Article Preview

Abstract:

A novel adaptive method for singular geometric regions was proposed. Combined with conventional cut cell adaption, curvature cell adaption and solution adaption, adaptively refined Cartesian grid was automatically generated after geometries had been specified by users. Solid wall boundary was implemented by ghost body-cell method which efficiently relieved the time step restriction of small cut cells. Flow field was well resolved on adaptively refined Cartesian grid with finite volume method. Transonic flow around the RAE2822 airfoil and subsonic flow around the Suddhoo four-element airfoil are carefully investigated, which validate the efficiency of current approach and its feasibility in complicated geometric regions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

537-542

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] G. Buttazzo and A. Frediani: Variational analysis and aerospace engineering (Springer, U.S.A 2009), pp.2-6.

Google Scholar

[2] M.J. Beger and M.J. Aftosmis: Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics (1998), pp.1-12.

Google Scholar

[3] G. Warren, W.K. Anderson, J. Thomas and S. Krist: Proceedings of 10th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference (1991), pp.729-741.

Google Scholar

[4] D.A. Venditti and D.L. Damofal: Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 176 (2002), pp.40-69.

Google Scholar

[5] W.J. Coirier and K.G. Powell: Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 117 (1995), pp.121-131.

Google Scholar

[6] E. Uzgoren, R. Singh, J. Sim and W. Shyy: Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 43 (2007), pp.138-192.

DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2007.06.003

Google Scholar

[7] R. Singh and W. Shyy: Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 224 (2007), pp.150-167.

Google Scholar

[8] D.D. Zeeuw and K.G. Powell: Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 101 (1992), pp.453-454.

Google Scholar

[9] M.S. Liou: Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 214 (2006), pp.137-170.

Google Scholar

[10] A. Dadone and B. Grossman: AIAA Journal, Vol. 42 (2004), pp.2499-2507.

Google Scholar

[11] E.M. Saiki and S. Biringen: Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 123 (1996), pp.450-465.

Google Scholar

[12] R. Ghias, R. Mittal and H. Dong: Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 225 (2007), pp.528-553.

Google Scholar

[13] H. Yoshihara and P. Sacher: Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (AGARD)-AR-211 (1985), pp.652-659.

Google Scholar

[14] A. Suddhoo and I.M. Hall: Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 89 (1985), pp.403-414.

Google Scholar