Optimal Spacecraft Attitude Maneuvers via Adjoint Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper studies the spacecraft attitude maneuver optimization problem. The maneuver aim is to avoid fuel cost by only using CMGs in the maneuver course. The nonlinear dynamic equations of the attitude system are established, the attitude maneuver optimization is depicted into a two point boundary value problem (TPBVP). The adjoint method is used to convert the TPBVP into the initial value problem. Numerical results indicate that the adjoint method is efficiently capable for attitude maneuver optimization.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

778-781

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] N. Bedrossian, S. Bhatt, in: Space Station Zero-Propellant Maneuver Guidance Trajectories Compared to Eigenaxis, American Control Conference (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/acc.2008.4587259

Google Scholar

[2] N. Bedrossian, S. Bhatt, M. Lammers, L. Nguyen, Y. Zhang, in: First Ever Flight Demonstration of Zero Propellant Maneuver Attitude Control Concept, AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit (2007).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-6734

Google Scholar

[3] S. Bhatt, in: Optimal Reorientation of Spacecraft Using Only Control Momentum Gyroscopes, " Master Thesis, Rice University (2007).

Google Scholar

[4] J. Goss, K. Subbarao, in: Adjoint Methods for Inlet Shape Optimization, 38th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Seattle, (2008).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-4381

Google Scholar

[5] B. Tapley, W. Williamson, in: Comparison of Linear and Riccati Equations Used to Solve Optimal Control Problem, AIAA Journal, Vol. 10, No. 9, pp.1154-1159, (1972).

DOI: 10.2514/3.50342

Google Scholar

[6] Z. Hao, in: Optimization of Glide Trajectory for a Hypersonic Vehicle, Journal of Beijing Univerisity of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp.513-517, (2006).

Google Scholar

[7] M. Nemec, M.J. Aftosmis, in: Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using a Cartesian Adjoint Method and CAD Geometry, 24th AIAA Applied aerodynamics Conference, (2006).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-3456

Google Scholar

[8] I. Ghazlane, G. Carrier, A. Dumont, J. Desideri, in: Aerostructural Adjoint Method for Flexible Wing Optimization, 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, (2012).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-1924

Google Scholar

[9] W. Liao, H. Tsai, in: Aerodynamic Design Optimization by the Adjoint Equation Method on Overset Grids, 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, (2006).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-54

Google Scholar

[10] J. Zhao, L. Gu, in: A Rapid Approach for Lunar Landing Trajectory Optimization, Journal of Astronautics, Vol 30, No. 4, pp.1564-1568, (2009).

Google Scholar

[11] J. Zhao, L. Gu, L. Pan, in: Numerical Solution of TPBVP for Optimal Lunar Soft Landing, Journal of Chinese Space Science and Technology, No. 4, pp.21-27, (2009).

Google Scholar

[12] G. Ma, Z. She, in: Rapid Optimal Predictive Guidance via Enhanced Adjoint Method for Suborbital Launch Vehicles, Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, Vol43, No. 7, pp.6-11, (2011).

Google Scholar