A Health Monitoring Method Based on Multivariate State Estimation Technique

Article Preview

Abstract:

The monitor of lithium-ion battery health is becoming a challenge because the performance of battery is effect by many environment factors. To address this problem, a new health monitor method based on Multivariate State Estimation Technique (MSET) and Sequential Probability Ratio Test (SPRT) is proposed in this paper. In order to demonstrate the performance gain of the method, a detailed experiment is performed based on a lithium-ion battery. By the comparison of performance parameters actual residuals and healthy residuals driven from the training data based on MSET, the fault detection can be implemented based on the SPRT.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

80-85

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Pecht and R. Jaai: A prognostics and health management roadmap for information and electronics-rich systems, Microelectronics Reliability, Vol. 50, (2010), pp.317-323.

DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2010.01.006

Google Scholar

[2] P. Tse and D. Atherton: Prediction of machine deterioration using vibration based fault trends and recurrent neural networks, Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, Vol. 121, (1999), pp.355-362.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2893988

Google Scholar

[3] K. Whisnant, K. Gross and N. Lingurovska: Proactive Fault Monitoring in enterprise Servers, Proceedings of the IEEE International Multiconference on Computer Science and Computer Engineering, IEEE Press., (2005), pp.3-10.

Google Scholar

[4] C.L. Black, R.E. Uhrig and H.J. Wesldy: System modeling and instrument calibration verification with a nonlinear state estimation technique, Proceedings of the Maintenance and Reliability Conference, (1998).

Google Scholar

[5] K.C. Gross and K.K. Hoyertv: Sequential Probability Ratio Tests for Nuclear Plant Component Surveillance, Nuclear Technology, Feb (1991), pp.93-131.

DOI: 10.13182/nt91-a34499

Google Scholar

[6] K. Goebel, B. Saha and A. Saxena: A comparison of three data-driven techniques for prognostics, Proceedings of the 62nd Meeting of the Society for Machinery Failure Prevention Technology(MFPT), May (2008), pp.119-131.

Google Scholar