Durability Analysis on Reactive Powder Concrete as Barrier Materials for Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal

Abstract:

Reactive powder concrete (RPC) has been proposed as barrier materials for the construction of engineered barrier in a low-level radioactive waste disposal site. The durability characteristics of RPC in such applications become paramount for the success of the containment of the wastes. The adverse environmental conditions at the disposal site could attack concrete barrier material and result in degradation of the material. Laboratory tests were conducted on RPC with various compositions to investigate the physical and durability properties of RPC. The effects of the addition of cement, silica fume, quartz powder, silica sand, steel fiber, and 2 levels of water-to-binder ratio (W/B = 0.25 and 0.30) on the properties of RPC specimens were investigated. Experimental results indicate that the long-term durability of RPC is significantly improved with the hydration of pozzolanic materials, which produces a very dense structure and thus exhibiting improved durability. The coefficient of permeability of RPC matrix determined using gas permeability apparatus demonstrated that RPC has much lower permeability than that of ordinary concrete. Heat-treating of concrete at 80°C accelerates the hydration process of RPC and shows enhanced physical and durable characteristics, as demonstrated by the chloride penetration test results.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 284-287)
• Pages: 1295-1299
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.284-287.1295
• Online since: January 2013
• Authors: Mei Ling Chuang, Wei Hsing Huang
• Keywords: Barrier Material, Durability, Reactive Powder Concrete

References

[1] Richard, P. and Cheyrezy, M.H., Reactive powder concretes with high ductility and 200-800 MPa compressive strength, ACI SP, Vol. 144, pp.507-518, (1994).

DOI: 10.14359/4536

[2] Papadakis, V. G., Effect of supplementary cementing materials on concrete resistance against carbonation and chloride ingress, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp.291-299, (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(99)00249-5

[3] AASHTO T259 (1990), Resistance of concrete to chloride ion penetration., AASHTO Designation.

[4] Takewaka, K. and Mastumoto, S., Quality and cover thickness of concrete based on the estimation of chloride penetration in marine environments, ACI SP 109-17, American Concrete Institute, pp.381-400, (1988).

DOI: 10.14359/2124

[5] Dong, J.J., Hsu, J.Y., Wu, W.J., Shimamoto, T., Hung, J.H., Yeh, E.C., Wu, Y.H., and Sone, H., Stress-dependence of the permeability and porosity of sandstone and shale from TCDP Hole-A, International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, Vol. 47, No. 7, pp.1141-1157, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.06.019