A Bridging Method between 2D and 3D Cephalometry Using Computed Tomography Synthesized Cephalograms

Article Preview

Abstract:

Traditional cephalograms are X-ray films, which provide either frontal or lateral overlapped perspective medical imaging. Although computed tomography imaging provides more information in 3-dimensional anatomy, the landmarks for cephalometry are located in space which does not carry normal standards in 3-D cephalometry. The CT natural imaging method is different from X-ray in that they respectively use orthogonal and perspective projections. Thus, we cannot apply the statistical normal values gathered from traditional 2D cephometry to 3D cephalometry. This study makes use of calibrated synthesized cephalograms from computed tomography to construct a cephalometry bridge between 2-D and 3-D. In this thesis, we first review the imaging model of a specific X-ray machine (Asahi OrthoStage AUTO IIIN) by a camera calibration method. We then construct a reference system for a virtual head, and synthesize calibrated X-ray cephalograms using the volume rendering algorithm. System accuracy for the synthesis X-ray cephalograms is verified through an interactive corresponding landmark system between 2-D and 3-D. An experimental clinician was invited to manually place 17 landmarks on the X-rays and their corresponding, shuffled in random order. The systematic error, average error, and standard deviation of landmark positions are 0.15 mm, 0.97 mm, and 0.45 mm, respectively. The interactive system bridges the transformation from orthogonal 3-D to perspective 2-D cephalometry.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1589-1595

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] W. C. Scarfe, A. G. Farman, and P. Sukovic, "Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice," J Can Dent Assoc, vol. 72, no. 1, pp.75-80, Feb, 2006.

Google Scholar

[2] B. H. BROADBENT, "A new x-ray techinique and its application to orthodontia," Angle Orthod, vol. 1, pp.45-66, 1931.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Gateno, J. J. Xia, and J. F. Teichgraeber, "New 3-Dimensional Cephalometric Analysis for Orthognathic Surgery," Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 69, no. 3, pp.606-622, 2011.

DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.09.010

Google Scholar

[4] M. Cavalcanti, S. Rocha, and M. Vannier, "Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications," Dentomaxillofac Radiol, vol. 33, no. 3, pp.170-176, May 1, 2004, 2004.

DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/13603271

Google Scholar

[5] C. Cutting, B. Grayson , F. Bookstein et al., "Computer-aided planning and evaluation of facial and orthognathic surgery," Clin Plast Surg, vol. 13, pp.449-462, 1986.

DOI: 10.1016/s0094-1298(20)31571-6

Google Scholar

[6] A. G. Farman, and W. C. Scarfe, "Development of imaging selection criteria and procedures should precede cephalometric assessment with cone-beam computed tomography," American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 130, no. 2, pp.257-265, 2006.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.021

Google Scholar

[7] L. H. S. Cevidanes, M. A. Styner, and W. R. Proffit, "Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models," American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 129, no. 5, pp.611-618, 2006.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.008

Google Scholar

[8] O. J. C. van Vlijmen, S. J. Bergé, G. R. J. Swennen et al., "Comparison of Cephalometric Radiographs Obtained From Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans and Conventional Radiographs," Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 67, no. 1, pp.92-97, 2009.

DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.04.025

Google Scholar

[9] P. M. Cattaneo, C. B. Bloch, D. Calmar et al., "Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms," American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 134, no. 6, pp.798-802, 2008.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.07.008

Google Scholar

[10] V. Kumar, J. Ludlow, L. H. Soares Cevidanes et al., "In Vivo Comparison of Conventional and Cone Beam CT Synthesized Cephalograms," The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 78, no. 5, pp.873-879, 2008.

DOI: 10.2319/082907-399.1

Google Scholar

[11] D. Grauer, L. S. H. Cevidanes, M. A. Styner et al., "Accuracy and Landmark Error Calculation Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography–Generated Cephalograms," Angle Orthod, vol. 80, pp.286-294, 2010.

DOI: 10.2319/030909-135.1

Google Scholar

[12] G. R. J. Swennen, F. Schutyser, E.-L. Barth et al., "A New Method of 3-D Cephalometry Part I: The Anatomic Cartesian 3-D Reference System," Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 17, no. 2, pp.314-325, 2006.

DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200603000-00019

Google Scholar

[13] G. R. J. Swennen, and F. Schutyser, "Three-dimensional cephalometry: Spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography," American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, vol. 130, no. 3, pp.410-416, 2006.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.035

Google Scholar

[14] Y. I. Abdel-Aziz, and H. M. Karara, "Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates into object space coordinates in close-range photogrammetry." pp.1-18.

DOI: 10.14358/pers.81.2.103

Google Scholar

[15] A. Lundström, F. Lundström, L. M. L. Lebret et al., "Natural head position and natural head orientation: basic considerations in cephalometric analysis and research," The European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp.111-120, April 1, 1995, 1995.

DOI: 10.1093/ejo/17.2.111

Google Scholar

[16] E. C. Schatz, J. J. Xia, J. Gateno et al., "Development of a Technique for Recording and Transferring Natural Head Position in 3 Dimensions," Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 21, no. 5, pp.1452-1455, 2010.

DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e3181ebcd0a

Google Scholar

[17] J.-J. F. Yu-Cheng Lin, "Voxel-based, image source-independent 3D Asymmetry quantification in the maxillofacial region " Advanced Materials Research, vol. 452-453, no. 165-169, 2012.

DOI: 10.4028/scientific5/amr.452-453.165

Google Scholar

[18] A. Richardson, "A comparison of traditional and computerized methods of cephalometric analysis," European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp.15-20, 1981.

Google Scholar

[19] K.-S. C. JIA-KUANG LIU, MIN-YWAN TSAI, , P.-F. T. YEN-TING CHEN, PING-HSIEN HUANG , and C.-S. H. , "Reliability and validity of cephalometric landmark identification," CDJ, vol. 14, no. 4, pp.230-239, 1995.

Google Scholar