Dynamic Stiffness Effects on Robot Safety and Performance in Human-Friendly Robots

Abstract:

Some researchers have recently investigated the effects of joint stiffness on both robot safety and performance in human-friendly robots using pneumatic artificial muscles (PAMs). However, due to the limited control bandwidth of pneumatic muscles, dynamic stiffness characteristics and their effects on safety as well as performance should be taken into account in the frequency domain. This paper introduces the concept of instantaneous stiffness and validates its model with the Stanford Safety Robot (S2ρ). The potential effects of dynamic stiffness on safety and performance are explored through experimental comparison of peak impact accelerations and sinusoidal position tracking, respectively. Simulation and experimental results with the Stanford Safety Robot show that the stiffness demonstrates limited effects on the impact acceleration given the same impact velocity and controller gain, whereas it significantly affects control performance due to pressure-induced non-linearities. A strategy for stiffness optimization for robot safety and performance is discussed as a design guideline of human-friendly robot design.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 284-287)
• Pages: 1836-1840
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.284-287.1836
• Online since: January 2013
• Authors: Dong Jun Shin
• Keywords: Human-Friendly Robot, Pneumatic Artificial Muscle (PAM), Stiffness

References

[1] H. Asada and T. Kanade. Design of direct drive mechanical arms. ASME Journal of Vibration, Acoustics, Stress, and Reliability in Design, 105: 312-{316, July (1983).

DOI: 10.1115/1.3269106

[2] A. Bicchi and G. Tonietti. Fast and soft-arm tactics. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 11(2): 22-{33, (2004).

DOI: 10.1109/mra.2004.1310939

[3] J. Choi, S. Park, W. Lee, and S. Kang. Design of a robot joint with variable stiffness. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 1760-{1765, May (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/robot.2008.4543455

[4] C. P. Chou and B. Hannaford. Measurement and modeling of MmcKkibben pneumatic artifi_cial muscles. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 12(1): 90-{102, (1996).

DOI: 10.1109/70.481753

[5] V. Gowdy, R. DeWeese, M. Beebe, B. Wade, J. Duncan, R. Kelly, and J.L. Blaker. A lumbar spine modifi_cation to the hybrid IIIiii atd for aircraft seat tests. SAE Technical paper series, (1999).

DOI: 10.4271/1999-01-1609

[6] G. Hirzinger, N. Sporer, A. Albu-Scha_er, M. Hahnle, and A. Pascucci. DLRlr's torque-controlled light weight robot IIIiii - aare we reaching the technological limits now? In Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Washington, DC, pages 1710-1716, (2002).

DOI: 10.1109/robot.2002.1014788

[7] K. Salisbury, W. Townsend, B. Ebrman, and D. DiPietro. Preliminary design of a whole-arm manipulation system (WAMS). IEEE Comput. Soc. Press.

DOI: 10.1109/robot.1988.12057

[8] D. Shin. A new actuation approach for bio-inspired human-friendly robots. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, (2011).

[9] D. Shin, I. Sardellitti, and O. Khatib. A hybrid actuation approach for human-friendly robot design. Proc. of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 1747-1752, (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/robot.2008.4543453

[10] D. Shin, I. Sardellitti, Y. Park, O. Khatib, and M. Cutkosky. Design and control of a bio-inspired human-friendly robot. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 29(5): 571-584, (2010).

DOI: 10.1177/0278364909353956

[11] D. Shin, F. Seitz, O. Khatib, and M. Cutkosky. Analysis of torque capacities in hybrid actuation for human-friendly robot design. Proc. of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 799-804, (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/robot.2010.5509628

[12] D. Vischer and O. Khatib. Design and development of high-performance torque-controlled joints. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, 11(4): 537-544, (1995).

DOI: 10.1109/70.406938