A Novel and Experimental Design for Mechanical Ventilation with Optimal Spontaneous Flow Pattern and WOB Feedback Control

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this study, we proposed an innovative design for mechanical ventilation by applying the previously implemented optimal respiratory control simulator as the controller of an experimental ventilation device. Instead of providing a fixed airflow pattern, an optimal spontaneous flow pattern was optimized by the simulator based on patient’s estimated respiratory mechanics and was applied to drive a ventilation device. We also implemented an experimental ventilation control system, including the simulator, a ventilation device, an artificial lung, and a feedback control mechanism to attain minimum work of breathing during mechanical ventilation. The experiments were elaborated to verify that once patient’s respiratory physiology was significant changed, the breathing signals and measured respiratory mechanics were instantaneously monitored, and the optimization process was renewed by the simulator under the feedback control strategy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2189-2193

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B.B. Longest, Jr. and C.L. Scanlan, in: EGAN'S Fundamentals of Respiratory Care, Edited by B.B. Longest, Sec. 1, Chap. 1, Mosby-Year Book, (1995).

Google Scholar

[2] C.B. Spearman, H.G. Sanders: Respir. Care Vol. 32(6) (1987), p.403.

Google Scholar

[3] C.S. Wang, D.I. Shaw and E.C. Yeh: Chinese J. Med. Biolo. Eng. Vol. 15(4) (1995), p.259.

Google Scholar

[4] R.L. Chatburn: Respir. Care Vol. 37 (1992), p.1009.

Google Scholar

[5] C.L. Scanlan and C. Blazer, in: EGAN'S Fundamentals of Respiratory Care, Edited B.B. Longest, Sec. 6, Chap. 30, Mosby-Year Book, (1995).

Google Scholar

[6] C.S.H. Sassoon, C.K. Mahutte and R.L. Light: Crit. Care Clin. Vol. 6(3) (1990), p.605.

Google Scholar

[7] H.I. Modell and F.W. Cheney: J Appl. Physiol. Vol. 46 (1979), p.1103.

Google Scholar

[8] J.L. Rau: Respir. Care Vol. 38 (1) (1993), p.132.

Google Scholar

[9] M.C. Khoo, R.E. Kronauer, K.P. Strohl and A. S. Slutsky: J. Appl. Physiol. Vol. 53(3) (1982), p.644.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Modarreszadeh and E.N. Bruce: J Appl. Physiol. Vol. 76(6) (1994), p.2765.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Mesic, R. Babuska, H.C. Hoogsteden and A. F. M. Verbraak: IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. Vol. 50(6) (2003), p.731.

DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2003.812166

Google Scholar

[12] C.S. Poon: J Appl. Physiol. Vol. 62(6) (1987), p.2447.

Google Scholar

[13] C.S. Poon, S.L. Lin, and O.B. Knudson: J Appl. Physiol. Vol. 72(5) (1992), pp. (2005).

Google Scholar

[14] S.L. Lin, H.W. Shia, and C.C. Chen, J Chang Gung Inst. Tech. Vol. 15 (2011), p.161.

Google Scholar

[15] S.L. Lin, H.W. Shia, C.H. Yang and T.C. Chen, J. Adv. Eng. Vol. 7(3) (2012), p.101.

Google Scholar

[16] S.L. Lin and H.W. Shia: J Comput. Info. Syst. Vol. 7(13) (2011), p.4594.

Google Scholar

[17] T. Fernando: The work of breathing of mechanically ventilated patients, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, Vol. 1 (1997), p.255.

Google Scholar