Study of Biodegradable Polyurethane Foam as Carriers for Low C/N Ratio Wastewater

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this study, the performance of nitrification and denitrification were investigated in a sequencing batch biofilm reactor (SBBR) with biodegradable polyurethane foam. The study aimed at solving the shortage of carbon sources for denitrification treating wastewater with a low C/N ratio. Ammonium, nitrite, nitrate, pH and Dissolved oxygen (DO) were carried out to monitor the process of nitrification-denitrification in every cycle. The results showed that Total nitrogen (TN) removal efficiency of 67.5% was achieved during a monitoring period of three months. The SBBR showed good behavior in terms of total nitrogen removal as the biodegradable polymer was an effective substrate providing reducing power for denitrification. According to scanning electron microscope, the biofilm from the inside of the Polyurethane (PU) carriers comprised predominately of small rod-shaped and spherical clusters were dominant, while clusters of filamentous form and few long rod shaped were observed on the surface. The used PU carriers after being washed with distilled water were found some cavities due to corrosion by microorganisms.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

352-356

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] U. Wiesmann, Biological nitrogen removal from wastewater, Adv. Biochem. Eng. 51 (1994).

Google Scholar

[2] S. Aslan, A. Turkman, Biological denitrification of drinking water using various natural organic solid substrates, Water Sci. Technol. 48, (2003) 489-495.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2004.0898

Google Scholar

[3] A. Boley, W. R. Muller, Denitrification with polycaprolactone as solid substrate in a laboratory-scale recirculated aquaculture system, Water Sci. Technol. 52 (2005) 495-502.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2005.0728

Google Scholar

[4] A. Abufayed, E. D. Schroeder, Kinetics and stoichiometry of SBR/denitrification with a primary sludge carbon source, J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 58 (1986) 398-405.

Google Scholar

[5] Choi, J. Lee, K. Lee and M. Kim, The effects on operation conditions of sludge retention time and carbon/nitrogen ratio in an intermittently aerated membrane bioreactor (IAMBR), Bioresour. Technol. 99 (2008) 5397-5401.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.016

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Honda and Z. Osawa; Microbial denitrification of wastewater using biodegradable polycaprolactone, Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 76 (2002) 321-327.

DOI: 10.1016/s0141-3910(02)00028-9

Google Scholar

[7] E. Walters, A. Hille, M. He, C. Ochmann and H. Horn, Simultaneous nitrification/denitrification in a biofilm airlift suspension (BAS) reactor with biodegradable carrier material, Water Res. 43 (2009) 4461-4468.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.07.005

Google Scholar

[8] H. Deguchi and M. Kashiwaya, Study on nitrified liquor recycling process operations using polyurethane foam sponge cubes as a biomass support medium, Water Sci. Technol. 30 (1994) 143-149.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.1994.0261

Google Scholar

[9] P. A. Wilderer, I. Röske, A. Ueberschär and L. Davids, Continuous flow and sequenced batch operation of biofilm reactors: a comparative study of shock loading responses, Biofouling 6 (1993) 295-304.

DOI: 10.1080/08927019309386232

Google Scholar

[10] R. Woolard, The advantages of periodically operated biofilm reactors for the treatment of highly variable wastewater, Water Sci. Technol. 35 (1997) 100-206.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.1997.0046

Google Scholar

[11] S. V. Mohan, N. C. Rao, K. K. Prasad and P.N. Sarma, Bioaugmentation of an anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor (AnSBBR) with immobilized sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB) for the treatment of sulphate bearing chemical wastewater, Process Biochem. 40 (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.12.027

Google Scholar

[12] A. Gieseke, P. Arnz, R. Amann and A. Schramm, Simultaneous P and N removal in a sequencing batch biofilm reactor: insights from reactor- and microscale investigations, Water Res. 36 (2002) 501-509.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00232-9

Google Scholar

[13] G. B. Zhu, S. Y. Wang, T. W. Li, Y. Y. Wang, Z. C. Lun and P. Y. Zheng, Separation of solid and liquid by sludge filtration, J. Harbin Inst. Technol. 36 (2004).

Google Scholar

[14] M. Morita, H. Uemoto and A. Watanabe, Nitrogen-removal bioreactor capable of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification for application to industrial wastewater treament, Biochem. Eng. J. 41 (2008) 37-44.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2008.03.008

Google Scholar

[15] L. M. C. Daniel, E. Pozzi, E. Foresti and F. A. Chinalia, Removal of ammonium via simultaneous nitrification-denitrification nitrite-shortcut in a single packed-bed batch reactor, Bioresour. Technol. 100 (2009) 1100-1107.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.08.003

Google Scholar

[16] K. A. Third, N. Burnett and R. Cord-Ruwisch, Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification using stored substrate (PHB) as the electron donor in an SBR, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 83 (2003) 706-720.

DOI: 10.1002/bit.10708

Google Scholar

[17] L B. Chu and J. L. Wang, Comparison of polyurethane foam and biodegradable polymer as carriers in moving bed biofilm reactor for treating wastewater with a low C/N ratio, Chemosphere 83 (2011) 63-66.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.12.077

Google Scholar

[18] B. Sinha and A. P. Annachhatre, Assessment of partial nitrification reactor performance through microbial population shift using quinone profile, FISH and SEM, Bioresour. Technol. 98 (2007) 3602-3610.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.034

Google Scholar

[19] N. Araki, A. Ohashi, I. Machdar, and H. Harada, Behaviors of nitrifiers in a novel biofilm reactor employing hanging sponge-cubes as attachment site, Water Sci. Technol. 39 (1999) 23-31.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.1999.0319

Google Scholar